Thursday, July 25, 2013


Kate's doctor Alan Farthing and the murdered BBC presenter Jill Dando

Alan Farthing was part of the medical team responsible for the birth of Kate and William's new baby.

He is the Queen's Gynaecologist.

Alan Farthing was the fiance of the BBC TV presenter Jill Dando who was murdered.

Cliff Richard was a close friend and confidante of Jill Dando.

Savile and William's mother Diana.

Jill Dando's BBC colleague Nick Ross is married to Sarah Caplan the cousin of Jimmy Savile's friend Esther Rantzen.

Caplan and Rantzen founded the controversial charity called Childline.

There has been speculation that the murder of Jill Dando is linked to "a VIP paedophile ring which was operating within the BBC and in Elm Guest House and various children's homes."

Jacintha Saldanha's family in mourning

In December 2012, Jacintha Saldanha, a nurse at the hospital where Kate Middleton was staying, 'was found dead.'

The official story was that she had committed suicide.

Some reports suggested that she had been murdered to shut her up.

'An early version of surrogacy' for Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, mother of the Queen.

One theory is that William and Kate rented the womb of a surrogate.

"Gestational surrogacy involves implanting the externally fertilized embryo of the biological mother (Kate) and the biological father (William) into a surrogate woman's uterus so she can carry the couple's baby full term and deliver it for them."

Royal Baby Scam 

"Since the 'in vitrio' conception occurred on December 3rd, 2012, the baby is due around September 5th, 2013 - unless it is delivered prematurely by caesarian section."

"The Queen Mother's real mother was her family's French cook ... the domestic help was 'an early version of surrogacy' for both Elizabeth Bowes Lyon and her younger brother David."

The cook was an 'attractive and pleasant Frenchwoman' called Marguerite Rodiere

More here: Royal Baby Scam 


Anonymous said...

You only need the most rudimentary grasp of obstetrics, or a modicum of common sense and an I.Q. score anywhere above learning difficulties - OR to have given birth to a large first baby yourself - to realise this pregnancy/birth story doesn't wash. Even in today's Britain that adds up to quite a lot of potential doubters. And that's just one aspect of this tangled web that could unravel in the absence of 24/7 dilgence, for the next few months, at least. No wonder our poor dear Queen is looking a little less than joyous.

Anonymous said...

BBC Pushing Lies & Propaganda For The Royal Family

Anonymous said...

Video of Clashes in Brazil Appears to Show Police Infiltrators Among Protesters

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

I agree that there's lots really off with the 'Kate preggers' and the 'royal baby birth', but I'm sticking to my view that the ritual murder of nurse Saldanah at King Edward VII hospital, including 'Kate's admission' and the script performed by the DJ's, was a communicae for the Portuguese group.

Anonymous said...

Who is the Portuguese group ?

Anonymous said...

Camilla Parker-Bowles Said Kate Middleton Would Never Be Pregnant

According to the current issue of GLOBE, print edition, January 14th, Camilla actually made fun of Kate’s difficulty conceiving a child.

Says a source, “She’d earlier gleefully said to pals Kate had fertility problems that could prevent her from producing an heir to the British throne.

Unknown said...

On the same day as the "Royal Birth" Prime Minister Dave Cameron announced legislation requiring ISPs to institute an "opt-in" policy for adult content rather than an "opt-out" policy, as is currently the case.

"To protect Children"

If anyone can think of anything more injurious to free speech and civil liberties, I'd like to hear it.

Because I can't.

Unknown said...

Public alarm increased when Queen Mary gave birth to a Roman Catholic son and heir, James Francis Edward on 10 June of that year.

When James's only possible successors were his two Protestant daughters, Anglicans could see his pro-Catholic policies as a temporary phenomenon, but when the Prince's birth opened the possibility of a permanent Catholic dynasty, such men had to reconsider their position.

Threatened by a Catholic dynasty, several influential Protestants claimed the child was "supposititious" and had been smuggled into the Queen's bedchamber in a warming pan.

Anonymous said...

@Paul Coker:

'If anyone can think of something more injurious to free speech and civil liberties, I'd like to hear it.'

If free speech and civil liberty ends up to be dirty stuff like porn, let alone child abusive porn, then free speech is already dead!!

Can't we do better than spreading all the filth we see around us?

Maybe people don't deserve 'free speech' if they can't handle it!!

Anonymous said...

Re Coker's 'opt in' - this already internet policy among some telecommunication providers. Aangirfan blog is blocked on 02's mobile fone network because they claim it contains 'adult content'. For me to gain access I have to provide 02 with my passport details to 'prove' I'm an adult. So this proves that the censorship tracking ID system,(touted by Cameron) has already been imposed on dissident websites.

Anonymous said...

@ anon.9.35 - Hallett's 'claimant'

Unknown said...

@ Anon 9.25

Yes, you are absolutely right about O2 and Aangrifan , thank you for reminding me - I believe it's currentt only on pre-paid pay-as-you go tariffs, the presumption being that if you have signed a contact, you are a responsible adult of 18 (with a credit file).

@ Anon 8.05

Sex is not filth - I utterly reject that notion and I think it's a dangerous idea to put into children's heads.

There is a difference between protecting children and shielding and sheltering them by limiting access to ideas, even erotic ones.

Sexual predators are just that - and children, through their innocence, assume the role of prey.

But an interest in pornography (I subscribe to Allan Moore's belief that "erotica" is a term that says more about the income bracket of the person using it than it does about the content) is natural and healthy, and those who are denied all access to it become socially maladjusted - even the Amish understand this and let their young people run free in late adolescents and make up their own minds about their future lives - turns out the Amish are remarkably savvy people.

I hear a lot of nonsense spoken about the NSA, Prism Hoax and "privacy";

There IS no right to privacy - that's dangerous in a free society and is the basis for the fascist application of English Libel Law to silence critics from Robert Maxwell, to Lord Macalpine, the Kengate Tapes, Savile, the business practices of News International, Arthur C Clarke and international freemasonry.

There is no right moral right for millionaire politicians and business thieves to prevent people telling the truth about them.

The libel ruling on Sally Bercow was terrifying - because the allegation was substantially true, and it shut down any further mainstream enquiry into anything associated with Savile.

But nor should a person be required to stick their hand up in the air and say "I like munching scat" before gaining access to scat porn.

Privacy is coterminous with secrecy in public life, but this is not that - this is the demand to citizens that they register self-incriminating information with an arm of state-corporate partnership for their files.

Unknown said...

The argument against porn control is exactly the same as the argument against gun control:

It won't work.

The dangerous people will ignore it, go further underground and become a HELL of a lot more profitable and you penalise the harmless law abiding people to zero net gain.

The people who are consuming most child pornography (for example), are not really the ones you should be worried about: many of whom harbour tendencies resulting from their own childhood abuses and are introverted, traumatised and maladjusted victims themselves.

Though Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks have been devastatingly effective in creating this Straw Man hate figure of the lone wolf pedophile with a funny eye and a limp, it's not one-eyed Pete that you should be worried about - its the Knights of the Realm.

They have little or no need for child porn.

They have unlimited access to children.

Unknown said...

New of the World editor 'spiked paedophilia scoop on Arthur C Clarke for fear of Murdoch'
Ex-reporter claims story never ran because the sci-fi author was the proprietor's friend
MARTIN HICKMAN, The Independent, SATURDAY 07 JULY 2012

The News of the World spiked an exclusive story exposing the science fiction writer Arthur C Clarke as a paedophile, according to a new book about life inside the newspaper whose closure was announced a year ago today.

In Hack, an account of his nerve-shredding days as a reporter on the News of the World and then the Sunday Mirror, Graham Johnson claims that although the NOTW prided itself on outing pederasts, editors made an exception for Mr Clarke because he was a friend of Rupert Murdoch.

Through BSkyB, the tycoon commercially exploited the futurologist's theory that satellites would be ideal for communications and praised him in public. As a result, according to Mr Johnson, who by that time had been sacked by the NOTW and had joined the Sunday Mirror, a story by reporter Roger Insall about Mr Clarke's alleged abuse of adolescent boys was never published for fear of upsetting the proprietor.

Tipped off about the story, the Sunday Mirror sent Mr Johnson to Colombo, where he extracted an confession from the author that he paid boys for sex. "I have never had the slightest interest in children – boys or girls. They should be treated in the same way. But once they have reached the age of puberty, then it is OK," Mr Clarke was quoted as saying in the Sunday Mirror. "If the kids enjoy it and don't mind it doesn't do any harm … there is a hysteria about the whole thing in the West."

Mr Clarke subsequently denied he was a paedophile, saying: "The allegations are wholly denied." But he never sued the Sunday Mirror and died aged 90 at his Sri Lanka home in 2008.

Speaking to The Independent yesterday, Mr Johnson said: "Roger [Insall] said that because Arthur C Clarke was a mate of Rupert Murdoch, the editor wasn't having any of it and despite Roger getting a lot of evidence that Clarke was a paedophile they wouldn't publish it."

Yesterday, Phil Hall, the then editor, said: "I can vaguely remember that story. I do remember that Roger Insall worked on it and I remember it was not published. My only recollection is that the only reason we wouldn't publish it was because of legal reasons."

He said Mr Murdoch never asked him to spike stories. News International, publisher of the NOTW, made no comment.

Unknown said...

Savile: There's nothing I can't get, and there's nothing I can't do.


[On the grand tour of Louis' Luxury Penthouse in Leeds, Savile welcomes his guests inot his boudouir where he gestrures over to his double-bed with a flourish]

Saville: "Here we are... The Altar..!"

Louis: "....why do you call it "The Altar"..."

Saville: "Because..."

Louis [Jokingly]: "It's not where you sacrifice people, is it...?


[Louis reaches up to examine a Charles and Di commemerative tea caddy from Savile's rather spartan kitchen cupboard]

Louis: Charles and Diana... Who you know...Can we talk about that...?

Savile: We can talk about anything.

Louis: You,,, don't want to talk about that....?

Savile: You'll find out how tricky I am...!

“He was a very complex character. The person on the TV screen and on the radio was a very different person to the private Jimmy Savile.

“He did lots of things for lots of people that he would not talk about, as well as his publicised charity work.

“He was heavily involved in helping set up a children’s medical health charity in the city, by raising a quarter of a million pounds.

“He was also instrumental in bringing Princess Diana to the city as part of Thomas Cook’s 150th anniversary.

“He was also a very intelligent man and was a member of MENSA.

“I once asked him what he did at Stoke Mandeville Hospital as a volunteer.

“He said he liked working the night shift at the mortuary, because he thought it would be easier for loved ones if he was there when they came in.

“He also said it was the only place in the hospital where he could smoke his cigars, as the inmates didn’t complain."

Pope Honors Rupert Murdoch, Roy Disney, Bob Hope
The three, who are not Catholic, are among 67 honorees in the L.A. area.
The knighthood awards cite character and aid to society, church.

Pope John Paul II has awarded papal knighthood to comedian Bob Hope, news magnate Rupert Murdoch and entertainment executive Roy Disney--all non-Catholics--along with 64 prominent Los Angeles-area Catholics.

Among the Catholics named were actor Ricardo Montalban, longtime Los Angeles City Councilman John Ferraro and hotel executive Barron Hilton.

Cardinal Roger M. Mahony will induct the men and women into the Pontifical Order of St. Gregory the Great in a ceremony Jan. 11 at St. Francis de Sales Church in Sherman Oaks.

The pope bestows the titles on people of "unblemished character," including non-Catholics, who have "promoted the interests of society, the [Catholic] Church and the Holy See [Vatican]," said Father Gregory Coiro, spokesman for the Los Angeles Catholic Archdiocese.

Hope, Murdoch and Disney all have Catholic wives, who were named Dames of St. Gregory, the female equivalent of a knighthood.

All have contributed heavily to church institutions, though no figures were made public. Bob and Dolores Hope, for instance, have donated to the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, Coiro said.

[NOTE: Murdoch NEVER gives away money....]
[And Savile Outranked Murdoch in the Papal Order of St Gregory

Anonymous said...

"There IS no right to privacy":
You have no right to enjoy your evening in the unviolated privacy of your home because otherwise we could not criticise Murdoch.
The Obama administration spamming this thread too.

Anonymous said...

The royal bashing, the aristocracy bashing has been a ploy by the Jews since the beginning of time- and was made memorable in theatre: "Les Miserables" the freemasonic jews vs the aristocracy, the jews could not be a part of it, so they destroyed it.

I am no longer a friend of Aangirfan, as your earlier pro-pedos for child care workers article some months ago, now you're joining the bolsheviks in this nonsense royal bashing.

Good luck to you! I'd say "God bless" but we don't worship the same God.

Unknown said...

""There IS no right to privacy":
You have no right to enjoy your evening in the unviolated privacy of your home because otherwise we could not criticise Murdoch.

I don't criticise Murdoch for phone hacking.

Everyone was doing it and it was standard industry practice.

It's no more or less immoral that dustbin diving - immoral but not a serious crime.

The privacy issue is a Straw Man throughout Leveson covering the real scandal - that in the Millie Dowler and Soham phone hacking cases, their actions uncovered and destroyed exculpatory evidence that proved Ian Huntley was framed and the killer (s) are still out there.

Holly Wells' phone was switched off around midnight, around 8m outside the fence of RAF Lakenheath, around 12 miles away and 6 or more hours AFTER she supposedly died in Huntley's bathroom.

I criticise Murdoch for being a fascist Zionist Freemason who protects elite pedophile rings and serial killers while framing innocent men and for being in on (at least) 9/11, 7/7 and Benghazi, as well as the October Surprise.

And despoiling the Earth.

Phone hacking is neither here nor there.

In Britian, I assume everything I do and say is being monitored all the time anyway.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 11:53 PM, the Royals are now Jewish too.

Site Meter