Monday, June 03, 2013


Ben Fellows

Ben Fellows is a former child actor.

He claims that a top politician called Ken Clarke groped his penis.


Clarke - a top man in Bilderberg. Formerly the minister responsible for MI5.

"Ben was informed by Dave Eden, a former CID detective, that his wife was in immediate danger as a result of Ben’s work.

"It was made clear that Ben should have an 'exit strategy'.

Ben Fellows.

"On Thursday 23rd of May, after the attacks in Woolwich (approximately half a mile from the Fellows residence), Ben and his wife returned home from visiting friends to find that their flat had been broken into.

"Nothing appeared to be stolen."

Ben Fellows with his wife Julia

"At 11:30pm that evening, the phone rang and an anonymous man told Ben to look outside his window to the other side of the street.

"A man in a black ski mask stood there on a mobile phone, the caller said 'What happened to that soldier today is what is going to happen to you'"


Anonymous said...

Israel Treats the Bedouin Like “People in a Box”

What is Happenning in Istanbul?

The CIA: Keepers of the Hit Lists. War Crimes as Policy

Anti-Government Protests Rock Turkey

Anonymous said...

I am a paraplegic and i spend my days on the net, i know of 5 whistleblowers who the past few weeks have disappeared from their homes, and belived to have gone into hiding

Anonymous said...

Greville Janner allegedly hosted/attended parties in the 1970s that degenerated into black magic rituals. The source for this was the late T Stokes.

Anonymous said...

Still not convinced this is nothing other than a publicity stunt from Fellows who strikes me as a pretty crafty self publicist. He's got himself into a corner now, will be interesting to see how he gets himself out of this one. The problem is that so many people have been duped by him / invested emotionally that they are just going to circle the wagons rather than look at what is a pretty straight forward attempt by Ben to reboot his Kengate story.

Anonymous said...

I don't take Fellowes disappearance as all seriously and one only has to listen to his wife in the interview to know that she is on on the scam.

HOWEVER I do fully believe Fellowes allegations about Clarke.

Fellowes does the cause of uncovering the truth - and exposing the large number of paedophiles at the top of British public life - no favours with these self publicising and immature stunts.

Anonymous said...

There was a good interview with Mrs. Fellowes on today's UK Column news roundup. Check it out at

Anonymous said...

His wife doesn't sound too concerned.

If you have suffered a crime or know about a crime and don't bother reporting it to the police either at the time or years later but choose to publish information about it years later and even publish the police interviews when the police come to see you, what would your evidence be worth in court?

Don't victims usually want to give themselves, and/or other victims if they have relevant witness evidence, the best possible chance of justice through the courts and therefore do nothing which could compromise their evidence?

Anonymous said...

the source for greville janner was the boys themselves i know as i took the statements
ex policeman colin caffery

Anonymous said...

forget the courts, its all bullshit, fremasons funny handshakes and odfellows and buffalos etc, all bullshit, you wont get justice in the UK, everyone knows that

Anonymous said...


6:34 AM

My source for the satanic rituals was T Stokes.

Anonymous said...

It says here ( that Ben Fellows was a whistleblower for Alex Jones. Was he really a whistleblower about the London olympics? He apparently contacted Alex Jones in LATE JUNE 2012 to say he had been working for G4S as an undercover journalist and was blowing the whistle about security for the London Olympics (see Alex Jones YouTube video of 28.6.2012 comment underneath says “Alex talks with Lee Hazeldean, a pseudonym for an undercover journalist who has blown the lid off the police state security arrangements put in place for the 2012 Olympics in London”). But the Daily Mail had already reported in EARLY JUNE 2012 (26 days earlier) that a woman G4S staffer had blown the whistle about this ( What independent evidence is there that Ben Fellows (A) worked for G4S and (B) worked there as an undercover journalist, as opposed to just working there to earn some money? He could have just read the Mail story like everyone else but decided to get some attention by spinning a story to someone outside the mainstream media in the far-off US. The guy is an actor and writes his own films (

Anonymous said...

"forget the courts, its all bullshit, fremasons funny handshakes and odfellows and buffalos etc, all bullshit, you wont get justice in the UK, everyone knows that "

There's corruption for sure, but not bothering with the police/courts is a great excuse for anyone planning to make claims that they know won't stand up to scrutiny. Victims of crime report crime to the police first, give a statement, etc. They are outraged. They want it on record. They want justice. This guy is acting as if the police insulted him by coming to him to question him about his allegations. He even says they threatened him (though he apparently missed recording them doing that). Then he declines to give detailed statements about celebs he's accused. So does this mean he's happy to let these other alleged abusers abuse other people, or does he simply not want to go through the stress of having to come up with a detailed story about them too?

There's a site called Guardianlies with a document called "The Cook Report: The One that Got Away" that casts a different light on the Cook Report sting. It says: "...they met up with ‘Richard Roberts’ and another Cook Report investigator, posing as ‘Ben.’ In furtherance of the entrapment of Ian Greer, the portly ‘Richard’ and the handsome young ‘Ben’ masqueraded as openly gay partners. ... A few days later ‘Ben’ called at IGA’s offices and told Greer that IGA had indeed been favoured with Ecocon’s contract to undertake research on the Insolvency Service. The openly gay and handsome Ben then invited Greer round to the apartment at 55 Park Lane for drinks together, alone, ‘as Richard would be out looking at houses.’ Greer declined the personal invitation, but thanked ‘Ben’ warmly for the contract."

So no 15-year-olds mentioned in that version. There he's "openly gay" and invites Greer to his apartment when he knows they can be alone.

Ben said in one of his interviews that the grope lasted 10-15 seconds, which is a pretty long time for someone who said he stepped away when the alleged groper previously stood too close earlier in the meeting. If there was a grope, did the groper really think Ben was 15 and was Ben really playing the part of an underage teenager, rather than an of-age "openly gay partner", or has Ben come up with the underage idea after the Savile scandal?

The whole claim rests on whether Ben told those present he was 15. Why should the Cook Report ask him to say that, if it was a sting about cash for questions rather than child abuse? Without the post-Savile conspiracy idea, there seems no logical reason why a fake lobbyist company would try to make itself look more plausible by saying it was employing an underage teenager.

Site Meter