Saturday, December 01, 2012


Website : Mysterious Boeing 737, NOT the United Flight 175 Boeing 767.

ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System) is a device used to send messages to and from an aircraft.

Acars confirmed - 9/11 aircraft still airborne long after 'crash' (

ACARS messages, provided through the Freedom Of Information Act, show that United Airlines flight 175 was still in the air after it had 'crashed'.

The aircraft received messages through ground stations located in Harrisburg, PA, and then later routed through a ground station in Pittsburgh, 20 minutes after the aircraft allegedly impacted the South Tower in New York.

New information confirms the aircraft was not in the vicinity of New York City when the attacks occurred.

This message was sent on Sept 11, at 1323Z (9:23AM Eastern, 20 minutes after the time of the crash) to United Flight 175, tail number N612UA, routed through the PIT remote ground station (Pittsburgh International Airport).


;09111323 108575 0574

The second time stamp on the bottom of the message, at United Airlines, is the "Technical Acknowledgement" from the airplane that the message has been received.

This evidence strengthens previous evidence uncovered by Pilots For 9/11 Truth that a standard 767 cannot remain in control, stable or hold together at the speeds reported by the NTSB for the South Tower aircraft(6).

So, if UA175 was somewhere out in Pennsylvania when an aircraft was observed to strike the south tower, and a standard 767 cannot perform at such excessive speeds as reported, then where did the airplane come from which was observed to strike the South Tower?

Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. 

The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center Attack along with other information provided by several government agencies through the Freedom Of Information Act.

The data does not support what we have been told. Government Agencies refuse to comment. 

Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. 

However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials refuse to acknowledge. 


Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

No planes at WTC, no planes at the Pentagon, no planes anywhere on 9/11

Is this news - seriously?

Any attentive observer who was not aware of this for some time now must ask themselves a few questions..

Anonymous said...

One word:


j said...


The Yes-Planers, who claim that airliners hit those towers, are certainly government-steered traitors in order to destroy the real 911 research community!
And with Yes-Planers I don't mean a harmless housewife or a teenager (who was probably still a baby in 2001) but with "Yes-Planers" I mean those who claim to be 911-researchers are well aware of the relevant facts.

We have to ask those 911"reseachers" who demand that planes hit the twin towers, WHAT plane hit those towers?

1.) Let's just take the south tower: The available video material shows us that there are not less than at least 4(!) different versions that are absolutely incompatible with each other:

a) There is the "Sturzbomber" (dive plane) - that dives down to the south tower with an ankle of approximately 45° - only to get into a more or less horizontal angle just in the very last second(!);
b) Then there is that plane that endlessly flies horizontally(!)
over the skyline of Manhattan - until it finally hits the south tower.
c) Then there's the “orb” - that hits the south tower with an ankle of 22° (see Simon Shacks "September Clues": )
d) Then - especially in the anchor news of the morning of 911 - which show a simple explosion in the south tower - with no plane to be seen at all!

Most of those incompatible version You find here:
The dive bomber (watch for 4Th second ) :
And most of other versions here: .

Now: Only ONE VERSION can be true - so 75% of the video material is definitely produced! Or, as I think, even all (100 %) versions are faked material. Thus even the (anchor news) explosion of the south tower without any plane (with fits with may vote) is faked. Simon Shack on researched why even that version was faked.

Like those of You, who researched, I've been - for years - on unnumbered blogs of Yes-Planers. But on those blogs - not even once!! - I found these four incompatible version being at least DISCUSSED. Not even the version of an explosion in the south tower WITHOUT ANY PLANE is discussed! Not even that version is declared to be a fake by Yes-Planers - which, by logic, they were bound to do so.
To me, a clear case of Orwell's 'positive thinking' (believe what You are told - even if it is totally contradictious or incompatible).

(PART 2 follows)

j said...


a) Where were should those static(!) Video cameras supposed to be situated? They always look down on the tower - you can see the roofs of the towers. But there was no other skyscraper in New York higher than the twin towers. Also there was mount in New York that was higher than the twin towers.
It's fabricated! See

3) In your opinion: Are these videos filmed by REAL cameras?
a) The "smoke": ;
b) Or This:
c) Or this 'jumping' plane: ;
d) Or this 'jumping' plane: .?

4) Also this: US Air Force pilots were trained already years ahead of 911 to intercept hijacked airliners.
The fact that no fighter planes started at St. Andrews Air Base (near New York) on 911 can only satisfyingly be explained with the fact, that there was NO AIRLINER AT ALL (except for some big grey military plane seen by a lot of New Yorkers).

5) In the film "Loose Change" - at least in the version I saw in 2004 - we are told that the director/head of the civil air surveillance of New York suddenly - and to the surprise of his employees - ripped off all the vireo-tapes from the vireo monitoring computers and then put the tapes all together into the hog or shredder.

Now: What reason would this director have had to destroy those tapes of the monitoring computers, if there had been planes hitting the towers and their route had been taped down? None!
But of course there was a reason to destroy those tapes if the official story that the towers were attacked by planes was easily to be ridiculed by those video tapes of the monitoring computers of the New York civil air surveillance!
Thus there was order given to destroy them!

j said...

Also see Simon Schack's famous "nose in - nose out":

j said...

... some versions as a gif:

Anonymous said...

All reasonable people seeking the real truth about 911 have a few things in do the dirty trolls who are tasked with hurting the movement.

REASONABLE PEOPLE know that 'we' cannot possibly sleuth out every aspect of the crime and prove exactly how it was done. The easily provable point is that the government establishment line is a grand lie, and only a proper, independent empowered investigation can fix that. If all truthers unite on that one issue, there is a chance of success.

All dirty greasy filthy TROLLS on the 911 files seem to want everyone to get lost in the minutia, and fighting over their versions of how the deed was done.
They aggressively go after their fellow truthers looking to provoke rather than learn or enlighten.

Case in point on this thread. The quality work done by the pilots is credible stuff, can be used on your friends and family who deride conspiracy types.

2:15AM missed entirely (or does he just hope we miss it?) the fact that this article says 175 was not there, but clearly acknowledges that some plane hit the we all know.

j is really trying very hard to start a fight with everyone, dividing us over details we can't truly know for certain. I see the j game on almost every 911 thread. What a shitty job you have dude.......why not go work for Walmart instead?

j said...

@Anonymous at 6:10 PM
Your produce only one argument and even that's directed "ad hominem" and not to the facts.
THAT is what I call "dividing".

Hre some more gifs:
The glitches proove: No real Films but animated ones:

From the Naudet Brother's film - an earthquake!

Site Meter