Monday, November 05, 2012


November 5 is Guy Fawkes Day in Britain.

It marks the day the London government staged its famous false flag operation.

The 1605 Gunpowder Plot was an inside-job.

Just as the London Tube Bombings and 9 11 were inside jobs.

The Guy Fawkes plotters Catesby, Percy and Tresham were working for the government.

King James I's spymaster, Robert Cecil, blackmailed Robert Catesby into organising a plot to discredit Catholics.

In 1604, Robert Catesby, an agent of the British government, was involved in the planning of the Gunpowder plot, a scheme to pretend to blow up the British parliament on the 5th November 1605 and kill King James.

On his death-bed, there were statements by Robert Catesby's servant that Robert Cecil and Catesby met on three separate occasions in the period leading up to the events of the night of 5 November 1605.

At a meeting at the Duck and Drake Inn, Catesby explained his plan to Guy Fawkes, Thomas Percy, an agent of the British government, John Wright and Thomas Wintour. All of them agreed to join the plot.

In the following months Francis Tresham, an agent of the British government, Everard Digby, Robert Wintour, Thomas Bates, and Christopher Wright also agreed to join the conspiracy.

Prior to the plot, Thomas Percy was seen coming out of the house of Robert Cecil.

Confession made under torture?

After the plot was 'discovered', Catesby, Percy, Christopher Wright and John Wright headed to a house outside London, Holbeche House in Staffordshire.

On the 8th November 1605, government troops arrived at the house and shot dead the conspirators: Robert Catesby, Thomas Percy, Christopher Wright and John Wright.

Digby, Robert Wintour, Thomas Wintour, Bates and Fawkes were executed in January 1606

It was widely rumoured that Francis Tresham was poisoned while being held captive in the Tower of london.

In his book The Gunpowder Plot: The Narrative of Oswald Tessimond, Francis Edwards claims that Francis Teshamescaped from the Tower of London, probably with the help of the Government, went abroad, and changed his name to Matthew Bruninge.

Robert Cecil - the king's spy master

R. Crampton, in the book The Gunpowder Plot (1990) explained:

"If Guy Fawkes case came up before the Court of Appeal today, the... judges would surely... acquit him...

"First no one has ever seen the attempted tunnel. Builders excavating the area in 1823 found neither a tunnel nor any rubble.

"Second, the gunpowder. In 1605, the Government had amonopoly on its manufacture... The Government did not display the gunpowder and nobody saw it in the cellars.

"Third, these cellars were rented by the government to a known Catholic agitator...

"Fourth, the Tresham letter. Graphologists (handwriting experts) agree that it was not written by Francis Tresham."

"Guy Fawkes was at a wedding of Cecil's niece, along with Cecil AND King James.

"Why didn't Fawkes kill the King there, and isn't it mysterious that all figures in the plot went to a wedding together?"

Was 5/11 an inside job? - Digital Spy Forums


    18 Sep 2012 – LONDON BOMBINGS CARRIED OUT BY THE SPOOKS? The security... Hasina was pregnant at the time of the London attacks. In July 2004 ...
    18 Aug 2012 – aangirfan: FALSE FLAG LONDON RIOTS? aangirfanLONDON BOMBS - REMEMBER LUMPERT aangirfan: AL QAEDA DESTROYING ...
    23 Jul 2012 – 5. The 7 July 2005 London Tube Bombings occurred the same day as a government terror exercise. On the same day of the London bombings ...
  4. aangirfanLondon Bombs - unanswered questions
    11 Oct 2010 – Was Netanyahu warned in advance? A report published by the Associated Press (AP) at 12:16 p.m. on July 7, authored by Amy Teibel in ...
    1 May 2010 – It is suspected that the London tube bombings, of 7 July 2005, were the work of elements of the security services. And that the alleged bombers...
    14 Oct 2010 – The London Tube Bombings look like a continuation of Operation Gladio, which used 'stay-behind' armies to carry out various acts, including, ...
    10 Nov 2010 – Headley Court military rehabilitation centre in Surrey. When looking at theLondon Tube Bomb inquest, or the 9 11 inquiry, remember Lockerbie ...
    9 Nov 2010 – Shehzad Tanweer was allegedly one of the London Tube bombers. Some people believe that Tanweer and his friends were being employed ...


Anonymous said...

Good article, although this has been said before but this put it very well, the only aspect missing
was that wealthy Jews from Holland were behind it to cause a war between christians, when oliver Cromwell shortly after borrowed the money from these jews to build his New Model Army, part of this agreement which Cromwell did not want to do was kill the king and kill maases of Irish catholics.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of James Bond and all his implications, here's an interesting guy too. Jewish, of course....

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

An example of a false flag terror plot for political gain and the same crooks are still at it 7/7 911 Mumbai Madrid.

Zoompad said...

Francis Rossi never gave me a creepy feeling, so I believe his account of this.

Anonymous said...

Not quite right. The fact is that catholicism is trying to rule the world via the jesuits. I'm Christian and I know that catholic isn't a Christian doctrine belief.

Stephen Gash said...

When asked by James I why he did it Guy Fawkes replied "To blow all the Scottish beggars here present back to your mountains".

The "Catholic emancipation" was the first piece of Scottish spin played out in this anti-English blighted union.

When the Scot James became King of England London was flooded with failed Scots living on the streets provoking the "King" to start a charity to help them. That charity still exists today as Scotscare that boasts itself as being one of the world's oldest charities. As always the English poor were neglected.

The Stuart dynasty ushered in decades of civil unrest that led to Charles I's 11 years of tyranny and the English Civil war. It turned the English trading companies into a warmongering British Empire.

James was unpopular in England and as soon as he took power he plundered England's wealth and installed a Scottish cabal just as happens now in business, media and politics all over England.

The United Kingdom was established with the soul purpose of erasing England and expunging the English and those goals have almost been achieved.

The true, ancient, charitable English Masonry, the York Rite, was infiltrated and corrupted by the false Scottish Rite masonry, in the 18th century, that now lords it across the USA instigating violent false-flag events.

England is the most invaded country in the world with successive invasions intent on eradicating the English including the Roman invasion, then the Saxon, then the Vikings then the Normans. However, the worst and most damaging event was the Union of England with Scotland enabling the unique usurping of England and the English with the political artifice of the United Kingdom and the cultural falsehood of "British".

The wrong man is burnt on the bonfires on November 5th. The correct effigy should be the Scottish usurper James I.

Stephen Gash said...

Of course I meant "sole purpose" not "soul purpose". There is no soul in the British United Kingdom, the biggest cause for the mutual hostility between the peoples of these islands.

Anonymous said...

I am an astrologer who does a lot of work for the Brighton gay community which is very large.
One of my clients is a news paper person close to Rupert Murdoch, who said to my client, make me a story about jesuit malfeasance that will take the heat off my other stuff, my client said after a huge search, there is no scandal with the jesuits, apart froma few boy-nobbings, he angrily replied, well thats expected here in brighton

Anonymous said...

Stephen Gash's post is excellent [5th November is an English, not 'British', event by the way], but fails at the end. England didn't exist until Germanic tribes, who later began to call themselves 'Engisc', got here to give the land a name, a language and a culture. Among the most important of these Germanic tribes were the Saxons. In effect Mr Gash lists an integral contributor to our national history as an invader out to destroy a people who didn't actually exist before this same group, with others, arrived to create what he claims they came to destroy. A mistake, I assume, but an odd one to make nevertheless. Excellent on the scots.

Site Meter