Thursday, July 05, 2012


Zeena (Thanks to P2P for the link)

Anton LaVey was born in Chicago, allegedly to a Jewish family.

Anton LaVey founded the 'Church of Satan'.

Anton Lavay (left)

"LaVey's most famous associate was the US National Security Agency's General Michael Aquino. 

"At the time of his membership in LaVey's group Aquino was an Army specialist in intelligence and psychological warfare." (C.I.A Cults)

General Aquino.

Zeena Schreck is the daughter of Anton LaVey and Diane Hegarty.

At the age of 13, Zeena was pregnant.

She became the high priestess and spokesperson for the Church of Satan.

Zeena and her husband Nikolas Schreck left the church in 1990, and, in 2002, founded a religious cult called the Sethian Liberation Movement, which allows the practice of magic.

Beelzebub's Daughter | VICE by Annette Lamothe-Ramos

Zeena in Berlin. Portrait By Florian Büttner

Zeena reportedly discovered that her father was a fake.

According to Zeena Schreck this was: "due to the intervention of the god Seth, who awakens through harsh disillusionment or scorn or through the shattering of everything that you thought was real being torn from you..."

Zeena says: "I began teaching black magic independently from the church..."

She temporarily joined General Aquino's Temple of Set, which she describes as "another abusive and corruptive group, and not at all what I was interested in."

“Michael Jackson was just a little boy of four or five when I accompanied Bob Hope to a place where they were filming... Their father brought the boys in and I remembered seeing them taken into a side room...They all had to drop their pants and bend over... a big man raped each one of them in a lineup." - Bryce Taylor - Website

Children at Dearborn Hills Elementary School in Indiana in the USA were reportedly used in Satanic ritual abuse.

Reportedly, the principle of the school, Chris Utter-Heller, was the local satanic high priestess and her husband, Jan Utter, was in the CIA.

America's Unknown Martyrs-The Little Boy Who Confronted Satan

Belief in evil spirits is widespread.

Hinduism includes numerous varieties of spirits that might be classified as demons

"Religious dualism, originating with the Zoroastrians, and filtered through Judaism, reached its logical conclusion in Christianity. 

"If God has innumerable angels as messengers, and a visible church of believers, it was reasoned that Satan must have demons as helpers and an invisible assembly of Satan worshipers."Middle Ages to the Renaissance

At ( we read:

"Michael Aquino joined the Church of Satan in 1969, while he was in the US Army as a psychological operations specialist.

"In 1975... Aquino and 28 fellow Church of Satan members left the group and founded their own church, the Temple of Set...

"In 1986... Charges of child molestation surfaced at the day-care center at Presidio Army Base, where Lt. Col. Aquino was assigned.

"Gary Hambright, a day-care worker, was charged with 12 counts of sodomy, oral copulation, and lewd conduct.

"Aquino... was identified by some of the children as possibly being another man who had participated in the molestations.

"However, no formal charges were ever brought against Aquino, and the case against Hambright was later dismissed."

Jeffrey Steinberg has written about Satanism and the U.S. Military (Satanic subversion of the U.S. Military):

On February 5, 1999, in the U.S. District Court in Lincoln, Nebraska, Paul Bonacci claimed that he had been ritualistically abused by Lawrence E King, as part of a nationwide pedophile ring linked to powerful political figures in Washington and to elements of the U.S. military and intelligence establishment.

On February 27, Judge Warren K. Urbom ordered King to pay $1 million in damages to Bonacci, in what Bonacci's attorney John DeCamp said was a clear signal that "the evidence presented was credible."

During the February 5 hearing, Noreen Gosch gave the court sworn testimony linking U.S. Army Lt. Col. Michael Aquino (ret.) to the nationwide pedophile ring. Her son, Johnny, then 12 years old, was kidnapped off the streets of West Des Moines, Iowa on September 5, 1982, while he was doing his early-morning newspaper deliveries.

Noreen Gosch said: "This ... was an offshoot of a government program.

"The MK-Ultra program was developed in the 1950s by the CIA...

"There was a man by the name of Michael Aquino.

"He was in the military. He had top Pentagon clearances. He was a pedophile...

"He was a close friend of Anton LaVey. The two of them were very active in ritualistic sexual abuse. And they deferred funding from this government program to use [in] this experimentation on children.

"Where they deliberately split off the personalities of these children into multiples, so that when they're questioned or put under oath or questioned under lie detector, that unless the operator knows how to question a multiple-personality disorder, they turn up with no evidence."

"They used these kids to sexually compromise politicians or anyone else they wish to have control of. This sounds so far out and so bizarre I had trouble accepting it in the beginning myself until I was presented with the data. We have the proof. In black and white."

AtPedophocracy/child_sexual_abuse_at_Presidio_and_West_Point.htm, we learn more:

Aquino, according to his official biography, circulated by the Temple, was a 'Lieutenant Colonel, Military Intelligence, U.S. Army.'

"Paul Bonacci ... positively identified Aquino as an associate of King who was known to Bonacci and the rest of the children only as 'the Colonel.'

"King's former personal photographer, Rusty Nelson, has identified Aquino as the man to whom he saw King hand over a suitcase full of cash and bonds.

"Rusty Nelson, has also said that he was told by King that Aquino was part of the Contra guns and cocaine trafficking operation run by George Bush and another notorious Lt. Col. named Oliver North.

"Aquino has also been linked to Offutt Air Force Base, a Strategic Air Command post near Omaha that was implicated in the investigation by the Franklin Committee...

"Aquino was also claimed to have ordered the abduction of a Des Moines, Iowa paperboy...

"In July 1988... the San Jose Mercury News ran a lengthy exposé on the Presidio Child Development Center run by the U.S. Army in San Francisco. Allegations of abuse being perpetrated at the center first emerged in November 1986. Alarmed by accusations made by her child, a parent had sought a medical examination that confirmed that her three-year-old boy had in fact been anally raped...

"Within a year, at least sixty additional victims had been identified... Many of the children also spoke of having guns pointed at them and of being told that they and/or their parents and siblings would be killed if they told anyone what had been done to them...

"Five of the children had contracted chlamydia, a sexually transmitted disease; many others showed clear signs of anal and genital trauma consistent with violent penetration...

"One mother complained to the San Francisco Chronicle that the FBI never interviewed her or her son, even after doctors had confirmed the boy’s abuse...

"The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry noted in April 1992, the 'severity of the trauma for children at the Presidio was immediately manifest in clear cut symptoms. Before the abuse was exposed, parents had already noticed the following changes in their children: vaginal discharge, genital soreness, rashes, fear of the dark, sleep disturbances, nightmares, sexually provocative language, and sexually inappropriate behavior. In addition, the children were exhibiting other radical changes in behavior, including temper outbursts, sudden mood shifts, and poor impulse control. All these behavioral symptoms are to be expected in preschool children who have been molested...'

"One child positively identified Aquino and his wife, Lilith (known to the kids as 'Mikey' and 'Shamby'), and was also able to identify the Aquinos’ private home and to describe with considerable accuracy the distinctively satanic interior décor of the house. 

"The young witness claimed to have been photographed at the Aquinos’ home. On August 14, 1987, a search warrant was served on the house. Confiscated in the raid were numerous videotapes, photographs, photo albums, photographic negatives, cassette tapes, and name and address books. Also observed was what appeared to be a soundproof room.

"Neither of the Aquinos was charged with any crimes...

"The U.S. Attorney in San Francisco handling the case was Joseph Russoniello. Russoniello would later be identified by reporter Gary Webb (of the San Jose Mercury News) as a player in the Contra cocaine smuggling operation led by Lt. Col. Oliver North and company, just as witnesses would later identify Lt. Col. Michael Aquino as an operative in the very same sordid affair.

"In May 1989, Aquino was again questioned in connection with child abuse investigations; this time, at least five children in three cities were making the accusations. The children had seen Aquino in newspaper and television coverage of the Presidio case and immediately recognized him as one of their abusers...

"Aquino was also identified by children in Santa Rosa and Fort Bragg, California. In the Fort Bragg case, 'allegations of ritual abuse erupted... in 1985 when several children at the Jubilation Day Care Center said they were sexually abused by a number of people at the day care center and at several locations away from the center, including at least two churches.' Aquino was identified as having been present at one of those churches...

"The Mercury News reported, 'by November, 1987 the Army had received allegations of child abuse at 15 of its day care centers and several elementary schools. There were also at least two cases in Air Force day care centers,' and another in a center run by the U.S. Navy.

"In addition, 'a special team of experts was sent to Panama [in June 1988] to help determine if as many as 10 children at a Department of Defense elementary school had been molested and possibly infected with AIDS.'

"Yet another case emerged in a U.S.-run facility in West Germany.

"These cases erupted at some of the country’s most esteemed military bases, including Fort Dix, Fort Leavenworth, Fort Jackson, and West Point. Many of those making the accusations were career military officers who had devoted their lives to unquestioned allegiance to the U.S. armed forces. Many would resign their posts in outraged protest...

"The Times Herald Record reported in June 1991, the 'incidents [at the West Point Child Development Center] unfolded against a backdrop of satanic acts, animal sacrifices and cult-like behavior among the abusers, whose activities extended beyond the U.S. Military Academy borders to Orange County and a military base in San Francisco, parents charged.'

"The case first broke in July 1984, when a three-year-old girl found herself in the emergency room of the West Point Hospital with a lacerated vagina. She told the examining physician that a teacher at the daycare center had hurt her...

The Mercury News reported, 'by the end of the year, 50 children had been interviewed by investigators. Children at West Point told stories that would become horrifyingly familiar. They said they had been ritually abused. They said they had had excrement smeared on their bodies and been forced to eat feces and drink urine. They said they were taken away from the day care center and photographed.'

"Despite abundant medical and psychological evidence and literally dozens of child witnesses, and despite '950 interviews by 60 FBI agents assigned to the investigation,' the investigation, 'led by former U.S. Attorney [and future mayor] Rudolph Giuliani' produced 'no federal grand jury indictments,'" according to the Herald Record...


Anon said...

"I had to defend myself because my parents wouldn’t get out of bed to defend me. They had other people caring for me since they were too wrapped up in their own problems and fought constantly. This mentality—along with our dysfunctional relationships and my father’s violence, fear, and paranoia—were the forces behind his teachings."

"In the 80s, Christian fundamentalists started using the church as their scapegoat, the group they could point a finger at as being responsible for these secret cattle mutilations, child abductions, and crazy government-related conspiracy theories they were hearing about in the news. I panicked, feeling as though they were attacking my religion and my father, so I contacted him and asked what his plans were to address the situation. I learned that he had no plans because he no longer had anyone to help him, and there really wasn’t a Church of Satan anymore. All of the members from the 60s and 70s no longer participated; they were just names on a mailing list. I decided I’d act as its temporary spokeswoman in order to show everyone that we really did exist. Somehow one year turned into five, and my fighting actually ended up helping to form new memberships within the church again.

My father, who was too sickly and frightened to ever do his own PR, was happy to have me handle things, but he and the remaining members of the church provided no realistic support when I needed it. He lived in a dream world where absolutely nothing to do with social issues was of any importance. We were the targets of a nationwide witch hunt, and all he wanted was for me to talk about Marilyn Monroe and Jayne Mansfield."

"Like most cults that are based on protecting the founder’s image, they do their best to attack anyone who says anything negative about their views or reveals the truth about them."

"Michael Aquino, who was formerly part of the CoS, since I assumed he’d had a similar religious experience with the real entity of Seth before starting the group. It wasn’t until I became more involved that I realized it was an Anton LaVey fan club. Aquino didn’t know anything about comparative religions, couldn’t argue theology or Egyptian cosmology… I kept thinking, “Maybe he’s being coy; we’ll eventually get to know his secrets,” and that never happened. It was my father’s legacy, another abusive and corruptive group"

Beelzebub's Daughter
How Zeena Schreck Escaped the Church of Satan

Anon said...

Anton LaVey's daughter Zeena left her father's Church of Satan (CoS), joined Michael Aquino's Temple of Set (ToS), then founded her Sethian Liberation Movement (SLM) to teach mistreated lost people resolve their problems with tantric black magic, meditation and self-hypnosis.
She is pictured getting sex from a serpent and styled as aristocratic high class whore in bad mood standing in a black coat showing something like a huge erection.

Satanism is a NWO-promoted (Royal Navy, Cabala, New Age, Freemasonry) movement like an empty shell. The Devil, Lucifer, Seth, these Gods of darkness and blinding light-shows ("enlightenment"), deception, torture, death and destruction, are exchangeable father-figures used to impress and mislead the weak followers like sheep. They are being enabled by religious upbringing teaching lies about invented invisible magic Gods and by widespread emotional neglect during childhood, leaving people in permanent search of all-powerful parent-figures. Practitioners feel powerful when they destroy, too stupid to realise that destruction is easy.
See Oppenheimer, "father of the atomic bomb", after detonating a nuke, citing the Bhagavad Gita: "Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."

Satanism is also being used as an underworld cover for prostitution and pedophiles torturing children, a practice used by the ruling mafia to bind their employees, priests, bankers, "leaders", "rulers" and heads of states. It's often easier to give orders when the recipients are persuaded they come from an all-powerful higher authority. The old trick to launch myths, "holy" books, temples and priesthoods to manipulate and brainwash people and form nations and empires. If it's "for the greater good" you can make people sacrifice themselves and their own children and kill others (satanic ritual sacrifice SRA, murders, wars).

LaVey "had followers who took things very seriously and genuinely believed in this entity Satan and not so much in Anton LaVey’s idea of Satanism. As it turns out, he wasn’t very knowledgeable on the subject and, in essence, created a postmodern version of Satanism as he went along. It was a manifestation of his ego.

He was very confused, and as a result, so are the inheritors of the church. He’s been accused of being a con man—which is accurate—but he wasn’t a very efficient one. He was lazy and never planned for the future or looked after his family because that is the nature of LaVeyan Satanism: Get what you can, live only in the here and now, care only about yourself, and get other people to care for you. It’s like you’re one big infant."

Newspaceman said...

Hiya, this seems related :


Anonymous said...

No need to double post... And FYI LAVEY or LEVAY wasnt Jewish... ZEENA is an exceptional woman btw...

P2P said...

"Jones thoughtlessly assigns "occult" motivations to the scientific overclass, who have been increasingly Maoist in their drive to annihilate any thought contagion outside of their rationalist/reductionalist orthodoxy, and have been using fronts like CSICOP (with its links to the international pedophile underground) and the JREF (whose co-founder was recently convicted of fraud in Federal court) to stamp out any traces of occultism since the early 70s."

m. aquino as indiana jones:


“From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory”. Co-authored with Colonel Paul Vallely, this [in]famous “thinking paper” examines U.S. Psychological Operations (PSYOP) doctrine as of 1980 and proposes evolutionary and effective changes. Contains a 2003 Introduction discussing the paper in its original - and appropriate - context."

Anonymous said...

These satanist cults appear to have nothing to do with any sort of religious belief, however sick and twisted. Unlike, for example, the Thaggi cults of India in the eighteen hundreds, which the British Raj put much effort into stamping out. The adherents of those cults deceived and murdered as a form of religious ritual and devotion, strange as that may seem.

No, these postmodern satanists appear to be some very evil, sick and defective puppies who use this "religion" as a cover for their perversions and experiments even. Just some disgusting criminals best dealt with by the police. Unfortunately, the police can't protect your soul.

How these people got that way in the first place is anyone's guess. But they're consigned for destruction. You really wouldn't want such repellent entities in a pleasant world, not unless you can burn away all that evil.

"You invited me. It is not my custom to go where I'm not wanted."
"Who are you?"

After all, this "religion" is fundamentally irrational. They worship a narcissistic entity the sole purpose of whose creation is the destruction of mankind. But created with rational intent: what better way of testing and sorting out human souls than constant, unseen and pervasive entrapment?

Of course, nowadays it's just some sort of comical cartoon figure. Which makes its work even easier.

The great satan hisself is red and scaly with a bifurcated tail. He carries a hay fork."

Eventually, however this thing will have served its purpose, as will have this world, and neither will any longer be required.

Anyway, you can just imagine it exists as Jungian archetype: Enemy of Man. Nothing scary really. Except for weak and suggestible people.

An archetype that each of us could meet face to face without even knowing it.

"What? What'd I just say? No, this isn't right. This can't be right. Get away from me!"

Satanism Infants said...

Thanks for reposting, Aangirfan.

Moviequoter, you write: "These satanist cults appear to have nothing to do with any sort of religious belief, however sick and twisted."
There are bookstores filled with their religious literature.
There are children lost between abuse and neglect finding an imaginary strong father figure to worship and trust, like this girl:
A religion is really just an unquestioning relationship with an imaginary figure with big power (re-ligio binding link back). We are children lost in a big scary world. Not many have the inner strength to stand on their own.

"You really wouldn't want such repellent entities in a pleasant world, not unless you can burn away all that evil."
In dreams, you can't get rid of animated menacing dangers (evil) by destroying them, because they can resurrect. You need to allow them to transform, or you strengthen yourself to feel safe. Same in the real world. Burning away evil in persons you perpetuate evil (mortal danger) towards them.

"this "religion" is fundamentally irrational. They worship a narcissistic entity the sole purpose of whose creation is the destruction of mankind. But created with rational intent"
This is a contradiction.

"what better way of testing and sorting out human souls than constant, unseen and pervasive entrapment?"
You can test people by giving them an option to do good.
Your question reflects medieval catholic torture test mentality.

"Eventually, however this thing will have served its purpose, as will have this world, and neither will any longer be required."
Required ?
By whom, for whom, how do you know ?

"Anyway, you can just imagine it exists as Jungian archetype: Enemy of Man."
CG Jung was closely associated with Satanism.

A fact he tried to cover up for years.
"There was also a figure whom Jung called Philemon, who became a kind of ‘inner guru’ and who he painted as a bald, white-bearded old man with bull’s horns and the wings of a kingfisher."

"Nothing scary really. Except for weak and suggestible people."
Isn't it scary to have a child abducted and used for torture ?
Or a bankster ordering war to fulfill his visions using luciferian networks ?

"An archetype that each of us could meet face to face without even knowing it."
Do you mean a sadist, for example ?

Anonymous said...

Feedback from 5:32,

Thanks for that. There are some things that need clarification, and you raise some good points.

1) "A religion is really just an unquestioning relationship with an imaginary figure with big power"

Umm, okay.

We've establish you as a typical atheist materialist then, blindly following the Dawkins dogma. Sorry for the mild ad hominem, but the nature of perceived reality can be far stranger than the superficial, facile and literal conceptions of atheists.

Moreover it is.

You even see a gradual shift in mainstream scientific thinking along these lines. Read Brian Greene's latest book, for example. There is a somewhat begrudged evolution in thought about physical and conscious reality and existence. Probably best characterized as a gradual shift towards monism, a unification of matter and mind.

Let me pose a simple question: What would the world be like if consciousness were, as it is, a synthesizable construct?

So, for example, if synthetic characters in fictional worlds were able to think, feel and perceive.

What would "real" and "exist" even mean? How would you infer your world were "not real"? Violations of causality? Violations of statistical plausibility? (premonition, precognition, bad coincidences)

Some time ago I googled the phrase "randomness tests as simulacrum tests", the first hit was the Wikipedia article on "Truth". A propos, I think.

Anyway, more concretely: let's say hot coffee suddenly froze or your hand quantum-tunneled through a table, how would you interpret such occurrences? They are physically possible, sure, just astronomically improbable. Are you going to think "how lucky" or "is this real"? Which is more plausible?

Atheists tend to think of believers as credulous, needing a placebo to assuage their fear of death. But eternal life is a far more frightening prospect than death, if it's spent somewhere unpleasant. Even more frighteningly, we can see on the horizon the engineering means of "implementing" immortality. Assuming this didn't already happen aeons ago. Which it almost certainly did.

Anyway, you can understand the atheist mindset. The egregious contempt much of organized religion has for truth, not to mention humanity, does nothing to endear it to the scientific mind.

Nonetheless, the scientific method is not a be-all-end-all. It is merely an epistemic tool we use to discover truth, or regularities in nature.

Science says nothing about purpose.

Why are we here? How should we live our lives in this world, by what rules? What is the hidden reality behind the veil of our perceived world?

This is the purpose of rational religion.

Religions mostly come to the same conclusions. The meaning of our lives is to understand and foster sentience. To maintain good, ordered community, friendship, love.

This is an information-theoretic evolutionary imperative even.

Hate promotes the destruction of sentience, a path to meaningless desolation.

Love promotes the continuation of sentience, and ever-growing flowering of sentient complexity.

What gives your world meaning?


"Nothing more. Nothing less. Love is the best."

Anonymous said...

Hi feedback from 5:32,

Sorry my response to one point turned into an extended-dance-mix response.

The other things you mentioned...

2) Your mention of dreams there is interesting. You mean of course lucid dreams, in which the dreamer influences the world of the dream. (Tangentially, in all three major monotheistic religions, it is recorded in various places that in the Final Days, the wishes of the righteous will tend increasingly to come true. That is, in a sense the world increasingly becomes like a lucid dream, shaped and influenced by the best of people.)

3) "We are children lost in a big scary world. Not many have the inner strength to stand on their own."

That's true, we are children lost in a big scary world. However it is an arrogance to assume you can stand entirely on your own. A man who invents his own moral code will soon be lost, gradually corrupted by selfishness and expediency.

4) "This is a contradiction."

Nope, it was just not phrased well. Let me try again:

"They worship a narcissistic entity that was imbued with the desire to destroy mankind spiritually. Its sole raison d'être"

That is, it was created as a stress test. To endeavor to, but not succeed in, the spiritual destruction of mankind.

5) "You can test people by giving them an option to do good."

Yes, that's the whole point. Throughout our lives we are presented with decisions. We can either choose what is right, despite the consequences being personally painful; or what is wrong, even though this is often the simple and comfortable path.

6) I know very little of Jung's religious affiliations, but they appear to be somewhat dubious and New Age, rather than traditionally Christian, for instance. But I see no evidence he was devoted to evil, the opposite if anything.

No matter; it does not detract from his worthwhile contributions. In particular, his reification of the concepts of synchronicity and cultural archetypes. His investigations into the strange and improbable of human experience were astute. He also ignored the standard worldview and trusted his own observations and inferences; something few have the courage to do, particularly when the standard worldview gave no explanation for how such phenomena are possible, in fact even contradicted the possibility. To do so, he really of necessity had to be part shaman and part scientist. And he is still often rejected as a pure witch doctor.

7) "Nothing scary really. Except for weak and suggestible people."

But this I mean that persons with a strong moral compass and the strength of their convictions are much less susceptible, even to subtle and subconscious influence.

Not that doing the right thing is always simple. It rarely is. Fairness and justice are often matters of complex calculation, far beyond human capability. We can only do our best with the faculties we're endowed with.
Read the Wikipedia article on "Fairness"; you'll see how primitive the state of our knowledge is in such areas. And look at the kleptocracies and tyrannies we live in to see how little our societies reflect the highest aspirations of decent humanity.

But slowly, arduously, we are making our way to a better world.

"Yes, why do we have to have evil?"
"Ah, I think it's something to do with free will."

Anonymous said...

"In the desire to appeal to the masses, Barton's
book makes it glaringly clear that the real motive of the Church of
Satan is to attract cash from "economic power brokers"; what other
reason could justify the sickeningly repetitive flattery she (he)
extends to Zionism, Bolshevism, and the state of Israel while safely
negating any Norse or Teutonic mythology?"

"My mother, a natural magician as incarnation of
Diana the Huntress, was the driving force of the most positive
aspects of the Church of Satan. As you are aware, her design of many
of the magical insignias of the Church, her organizational and
administrative abilities, her uncredited contributions to the
_Satanic Bible_ and _Rituals_, and her charisma are but some of the
elements that proved her to be the backbone of what was once a vital
entity. As duality is a necessary dynamic in any form of progress,
it is mathematically easy to see that when one portion of the
duality is repelled, the other collapses into passivity. I am the
living essence of this particular duality maintained at its peak."

Site Meter