Wednesday, April 11, 2012



On 10 april 2012, Nile Bowie writes:

"A divided and warring Nigeria ultimately serves the interests of the United States as cited by Zbigniew Brzezinski, top adviser to Barack Obama and leading US foreign policy theoretician.

"Brzezinski, who co-founded the Trilateral Commission and openly credits himself with the creation of the Afghan Mujahideen, has influenced policy that encourages the division of existing nation-states by the succession and emergence of microstates, based on all cultural, ethnic and religious peculiarities.

"Author and historian Dr. Webster G. Tarpley writes, “For Africa, Brzezinski recommends the so-called ‘micro-nationalities’ concept, which means that national boundaries established in the 19th century should be swept aside in favor of a crazy quilt of petty tribal entities, each one so small that it could not hope to resist even a medium-sized oil multinational” .

"Following the mass exodus of Chinese business interests during the Libyan conflict, a shattered Nigeria would ultimately create conditions where China’s growing cooperation with Abuja can be challenged and ultimately, disrupted.

"China has provided extensive economic, military and political support to Nigeria, an important source of oil and petroleum for Beijing. In addition to sponsoring Nigeria for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council, China has invested in Africa’s booming telecommunications market by building and launching a geostationary commercial satellite, owned by Nigeria and operated in Abuja, as a gesture of increased partnership between the two nations.

"In 2010, China and Nigeria signed a $23 billion deal to construct three fuel refineries in Nigeria, adding an extra 750,000 barrels per day of domestic refining capacity."

CONTINUED HERE: Nigeria: Fertile Ground for Balkanization


CS said...

The UK is also fertile ground for Balkanization into micro-states "unable to resist even a medium-sized oil multinational."

Unknown said...

What we must not lose sight of, is how the West, especially the US, converted so-called Islamic Jihadists into doing their dirty work for them. A couple of things become apparent here. (1) That these elements were never enemies of the US establishment as projected by the MSM but their partners in terror. (2) That the so-called war on terror which had as its focus Islamic fundamentalism and fanaticism was a pretext for corralling economic spheres around the globe. (3) That once prosperous countries (like Libya for instance) are being infiltrated by these stone age mercenaries to inflict the highest levels of terror, break up nation states and effect regime change. (4) That the West/US found in them and their killing zest the perfect patsies. (5) by employing these savage and wild dogs of war, funded and armed by the West/US, these countries, through them, employ the most primitive and brutal means of war, and by fronting them, are able to maintain a veneer of civility which allows them to proudly hold up their trophy of 'humanism' while pointing at their fall guys (expendables) as terrorists that plague our world. (6) that no thought is being given to the day after, being that they are given portions of whole countries and their military might and capabilities being honed to perfect killing machines, yet, nobody worries about the day these mad dogs will turn to bite their masters.

The simple truth? The West/US have let go a catastrophic boomerang that is orbiting to hit them in face.

Anonymous said...

Still wondering about "aangirfan" ... who did not mention (like ALL British media) the mega-crime of a young ex-Soviet sodomite - Latvian Robert Mikelsons. Babies and toddlers (83 ?) sexually abused in Amsterdam nurseries.

Anonymous said...

Absolutely wrong analysis of the situation ! Arabs have perfected a genocide in Sudan for decades, was the USA wrong to intervene?
Nigeria is being held back by people who do not believe in western ideals, does this sound progressive?


Site Meter