Thursday, December 01, 2011



What links the 1968 assassination of Robert Kennedy to the Norway Attacks of 2011?

Sirhan Sirhan is a Christian, accused of killing Robert Kennedy.

Anders Breivik is a Christian, accused of carrying out the attacks in Norway.

Both Sirhan and Breivik were most likely brainwashed, and both are most likely innocent.

Anders Breivik has been declared by psychiatrists to be insane, which suggests possible brainwashing; the Norway Attacks were an INSIDE JOB.

Sirhan Sirhan's lawyers say that Sirhan was 'hypno-programmed'.

He was to be a diversion for the real assassins.


Anders Breivik was most likely a patsy, a diversion for the real assassins.

Anders Breivik

In a US court, Sirhan's lawyers say that an expert analysis of recently uncovered evidence shows:

(1) two guns were fired in the assassination and

(2) Sirhan's revolver was not the gun that shot Kennedy.

The lawyers allege that in Sirhan's 1969 trial the court allowed a substitute bullet to be admitted as evidence for a real bullet removed from Kennedy's neck.

According to court papers:

1. Sirhan "was an involuntary participant in the crimes being committed because he was subjected to sophisticated hypno programming and memory implantation techniques which rendered him unable to consciously control his thoughts and actions at the time the crimes were being committed."

2. The state "refuses to acknowledge that hypno programming/mind control is not fiction but reality and has been used for years by the U.S. military, Central Intelligence Agency and other covert organizations.

3. "Though the practices of hypno programming/mind control is hardly new, the public has been shielded from the darker side of the practice. The average person is unaware that hypnosis can and is used to induct antisocial conduct in humans."



CS said...

The BBC has a documentary indicating that RFK was assassinated by a CIA faction connected with the Bay of Pigs fiasco, for which they held JFK to blame.

nobody said...

Hullo Aang, are you familiar with the Port Arthur massacre that took place in Tasmanania, Australia in 1996? 35 dead, 21 wounded. I just now finished reading a pretty good pdf that laid it out (courtesy wikispooks). Actually the piece assumes a basic knowledge. I recommend starting with wikipedia.

The thing is, Martin Bryant, the accused in the case, could well be described as Anders Breivik meets Marinus van der Lubbe, if you can dig it. Bryant was never tried but after seven months of solitary confinement signed a confession and was promptly locked away never to be seen again.

Nor was he ever interviewed, nor even photographed. Apart from the wild-eyed photos published in every Australian newspaper the day after the massacre (in full contravention of the law) and one other single blurry shot, no one even knows what he looks like.

His girlfriend/handler who fingered him disappeared off the face of the earth and seems never to have existed beyond her one interview. There was also no circumstantial evidence that wasn't absurd on its face and all the witnesses identified another person.

Anyway have a read. And don't miss the end. The too curious removal of all local staff and their replacement with outsiders just before the murders, not to mention the government of Tasmania (6 murders a year) buying a 22 berth mortuary vehicle immediately before the massacre and selling it immediately afterwards is just too spooky.

CS said...

Sirhan Sirhan's lawyers are requesting a new trial.

"The lawyers argue audio recordings from the incident back up their assertion that there was a second gunman.

The recordings "clearly showed that 13 shots were fired in the pantry, and Sirhan's gun had only eight shots, so it definitely means there was a second shooter ..."

CS said...

In today's Daily Record: Bullet switch proves Sirhan Sirhan innocent of Robert F Kennedy assassination, claim lawyers

Site Meter