Tuesday, December 29, 2009


This is not from the Daily Mail, 29 December 2009:

Al Qaeda, run by the CIA and its friends, announced on 28 December 2009 that they were behind the Christmas jet bomb plot.

The CIA said it provided Nigerian Abdul Abulbul with a 'device' but it had failed to detonate because it was not meant to.

A statement posted on CIA-Islamist websites said the attack was to help justify US intervention in Yemen.

The US hopes to counter Russian and Chinese influence in Yemen, and hopes to balkanise Saudi Arabia.

The CIA-Islamist website showed a picture of Abdul referring to him as Patsy al-Nigiri - the Nigerian patsy.

'With the cooperation of Israeli security firms in Amsterdam, he managed to penetrate all devices and modern advanced technology and security checkpoints in international airports bravely without fear of death,' said the website statement.

The 23-year-old has told the FBI he was tutored in terrorism while living for a month with a senior CIA commander in Yemen.

He is said to have warned that other young men are being trained there to advance the cause of US imperialism.

President Barack Obama said: 'We will continue to use every element of our national power to balkanise strategically important Moslem countries.'

In London, Home Secretary Alan Johnson said police were examining whether the son of one of Africa's richest men had been recruited as a patsy by MI5 or MI6 during three years studying engineering at University College London.

The Nigerian is reported to have 'crossed the radar' of MI5 while in the UK.

Abdul Abulbul was on a U.S. watch list, although it allowed him to travel on planes flying into the country.

Double agents and patsies ran the Gunpowder Plot

Famous Jewish journalist Melanie Phillips did not write the following:

So here we go again.

Another CIA-Mossad-MI6 terrorist plot, and yet another British connection.

How did Abdul Abulbul obtain a U.S. visa when he had been on an American watch-list of people with known terrorist connections?

But the deeper and more urgent issue for Britain concerns the key role Britain has once again played in the Pentagon's plans for world domination.

Abdul Abulbul, who claims to have been working for the CIA, was a student at a University in London for three years until 2008.

He was refused an entry visa to Britain earlier in 2009, but only because the institution at which he said he wanted to study turned out to be non-existent.

How, people might well ask, could such a radical have been educated in Britain without the authorities jumping on him?

Presumably he had been recruited by MI5 as a patsy.

Who can be surprised? After all, this is ' Londonistan' - the term coined by the French spooks back in the Nineties as they watched Britain become the central hub of CIA-Islamic terrorism in Europe.

Radicals flocked to the UK, attracted by Britain's toxic lax immigration controls.

CIA-Islamic extremist networks are still allowed to flourish in Britain, largely due to the governing class with its fascist and mafia agenda.

The courts are still refusing to deport terrorists who work for the security services.

London boasts the shameful reputation of the world's top money-laundry for CIA terrorism.

Yet the government refuses to outlaw Hizb ut-Tahrir.

The Government is funnelling money into extremist Islamist groups.

'Authentic' Islam is peaceful.

But the CIA plan is to weaken oil rich Moslem countries by promoting extremism and feudalism.

Who are the real bad guys?

The following was not written by the New York Times about 'the clash of civilisations':

It used to be the rogue state of Israel that was involved in a clash with liberals and democrats in the West.

Why was there a clash?

1. The Israelis had used terror to drive the Arabs off their land.

2. Some of the Israelis were religious fundamentalists with 'weird, outdated beliefs'.

But, certain clever people in the USA have managed to change the story.

Now the clash is supposed to be between the 'mad Moslems' on the one side and the western liberals and democrats on the other.

How has the Pentagon and the CIA, together with its friends in Israel, managed to stir a clash between Moslems and the West?

1. Has the CIA/Pentagon given its support to Islamic fundamentalists in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Afghanistan?

2. Has the CIA/Pentagon/Mossad infiltrated fundamentalist Christianity and allied it to Zionism?

3. Have certain western politicians allowed large numbers of poorly educated Moslem illegal-immigrants to enter certain western countries?

4. Did the CIA/Pentagon recruit Osama bin Laden and people like Mohamed Atta?

5. Have some ignorant Moslems been recruited by certain security services to take part part in various dubious activities?

6. Has a 'Jewish influenced' media stirred up trouble between Christians and Moslems?

7. Have large numbers of Moslems allowed themselves to be brain-washed and manipulated?

It is our impression, after visiting half a dozen Moslem countries, that the great majority of Moslems are moderate, tolerant, hospitable people.

Moderation, tolerance and hospitality can evaporate under pressure.

The Palestinians have had their land stolen and their children murdered - hence the vote for Hamas. Most Palestinians are not fundamentalists!

The CIA gave Iran the dictatorship of the Shah and then the dictatorship of the Ayatollahs.

The Iraqis had the CIA agent Saddam Hussein imposed on them and then they had their country manipulated into a war against Iran. More recently, a relatively secular Iraq has become a more fundamentalist Iraq.

The CIA has helped keep pro-western governments in power in Morocco and Algeria. This has encouraged moderate Moslems to turn to fundamentalist politicians.

The Americans have kept the Saudi monarchy in power.

The CIA toppled Indonesia's Sukarno and Suharto.

If you watch the media carefully you begin to notice the pattern of brainwashing:

Photo of Professor Bernard Lewis by the Office of Communications, Princeton University. Lewis was a Professor at Princeton and he specialized in the history of Islam and the relationship between Islam and the West.

Dick Cheney's friend, Bernard Lewis, was "perhaps the most significant intellectual influence behind the invasion of Iraq." (AEI's Weird Celebration)

Bernard Lewis helped to invent the West's new enemy, known as 'Islam'.

For the British, it was once the Jewish terrorists who were seen as being the enemy.

For the USA, it was once tiny Vietnam.

Professor Bernard Lewis is Jewish and has worked for British intelligence.

(Bernard Lewis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia )

Lewis, born in London in 1916, is a historian and 'expert' on Islam.

In 1974, Lewis accepted a position at Princeton University.

In 1990, Lewis wrote an essay entitled The Roots of Muslim Rage.

In this essay, Lewis argued that the struggle between the West and Islam was gathering strength.

In this essay Lewis invented the phrase "clash of civilizations", which got mentioned in the book by Samuel Huntington.[13]

Typical Moslems - friendly, easy going and hospitable.

The phrase "clash of civilizations", was first used by Lewis at a meeting in Washington in 1957. [14]

There has been speculation that Lewis, the intelligence services and people like Brzezinski want to make the Moslem world look bad, so that it can be more easily controlled and exploited.

Much of the world's oil lies in Moslem lands.

How do you make Moslems look bad?

You can finance the extremists and help them into power.

You can carry out false flag operations.

Bernard Lewis argues (Bernard Lewis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) that the Middle East is backward due to its culture and religion.

The alternative view is that a country like Iraq is backward partly because of constant interference by countries such as Britain and the USA.

In his 1982 book Muslim Discovery of Europe, Lewis claims that "Crusader successes were due in no small part to Muslim weakness."

What Lewis does not make clear is that the Crusaders were barbarians and that they slaughtered innocent people wherever they went. The Fourth Crusade invaded and conquered and looted the Christian city of Constantinople.

Lewis opposes the idea that Israel is a racist country.

He argues that Moslems behaved badly in the Algerian civil war (1992–98) and in the Iran-Iraq War (1980–88).

Lewis fails to point out that certain security services helped prevent democracy from taking place in Algeria in 1991. (aangirfan: Fake terror in Algeria; the US military in Algeria; oil ...)

Lewis fails to point out that many people believe that both Saddam and the Ayatollahs were put into power by the CIA. (aangirfan: Saddam worked for the CIA / aangirfan: The Ayatollahs and the CIA)

Christian Crusaders attacking the Christian city of Constantinople

Lewis's latest book is called Islam: The Religion and the People.

Lewis states quite correctly:

1."At no time did the (Muslim) jurist approve of terrorism. Nor indeed is there any evidence of the use of terrorism (in Islamic tradition)."

2."Muslims are commanded not to kill women, children, or the aged; not to torture or otherwise ill-treat prisoners; to give fair warning of the opening of hostilities; and to honor agreements."

3."Terrorism ... has no antecedents in Islamic history, and no justification in terms of Islamic theology, law, or tradition...

4."The fanatical warrior offering his victims the choice of the Koran or the sword is not only untrue, it is impossible."

5."Generally speaking, Muslim tolerance of unbelievers was far better than anything available in Christendom."

Typical Moslems.

So, where did terrorism come from?

The Pentagon and its friends are reported to be the brains behind the terrorism (Classic State Terrorism)

And Lewis is unlikely to mention Michael Ledeen, Gladio and 9 11.

Lewis seeks closer Western ties with Israel.

In his essay "A License to Kill", Lewis wrote that he considered bin Laden's language as the "ideology of jihad".

Lewis is unlikely to tell us about the work the bin Ladens have done for the US government (The bin Laden Family)

Lewis has clashed with Edward W. Said, the Palestinian-American scholar who is a professor at Columbia University.

In Al-Ahram Weekly, Said claimed "Bernard Lewis hasn't set foot in the Middle East, in the Arab world, for at least 40 years.

"He knows something about Turkey, I'm told, but he knows nothing about the Arab world." ("Resources of hope,")

Edward Said considered that Lewis failed to see Moslems as a whole lot of different sorts of people.

In a 2002 interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Noam Chomsky claimed that Lewis failed to point out that "there's a perception in (the Middle east) that the United States supports status quo governments, which prevent democracy and development" and that this has to do with Middle East oil. (Hot Type Transcript)

Lewis supported the Iraq War.

In a 2006 article for the "Wall Street Journal" Lewis asserted that Iran was working on a nuclear weapon.



Edo said...

Excellent Post Aangirfan!

Ali.mostaque said...

This is a false flag op obviously........which is of the more shoddier variety, that even prompts the editor of the antiwar.com site which fronts the point of view of USA intelligence officers and a Rothschild......into being cynical about it:



The Hero of the hour is Jewish it seems according to Judicial-inc.

I assume you know Jews and the Netherlands (their influence in the country over 400 years)........and ALL the other drama surrounding "Fitna" and Van Wilders more recently:


So apt and timely that this should come out of Holland, at Christmas, a with Richard Reed, the other retard patsy in 2001.

The mystery is the 2 "Indian" sited by and over heard by one of the passengers guiding our retard patsy....RAW/ISI...?????

Ali.mostaque said...

As to the USA empire for oil meme that is a lame left-wing gossip that has no connection to reality:

The Iraqi government has very recently awarded ALL contracts in significant oil fields for exploitation to non-American corporations.

In Afghanistan there is no oil.

Yemens oil will run out by 2016.

It makes more sense to argue, and therefore more nuanced to say that America has an MIC worth $1,500 billion which requires constant war to feed and justify its existence.

AND Israel would like American power to smash as many Muslim countries in its very wide vicinity as possible.

Other than that there may be particular local factors which explain why America is in a country, such as Afghanistan with its heroin/Opium.

The wars for oil neme is the least important, and it seems non-existent, even though the likes of Wolfowitz, Greenspan and other prominent Jews have pushed for this explanation, and the Hollywood movie...."Avatar", purportedly metaphors of Iraq/Afghanistan, reinforce this false belief.

David G. said...

Therese left your blog link on my site. It's a great read, Anon.

Keep up the good work although there is a lot of work to do, eh? Undoing indoctrination is not easy.

nobody said...

A cracker. Hats off.

Site Meter