Wednesday, October 29, 2008


Does he look partly British?

Was the Ayatollah Khomeini secretly working with the US and UK governments?

Was Iran working with the CIA at the time of the 1980 hostage crisis and the October Surprise?

Was Iran working with the CIA at the time of the Lockerbie Bombing?

Agent of British intelligence?

In 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini took over Iran.

In 1979, Grand Ayatollah Mussa Sadr disappeared during a visit to Libya.

Mussa Sadr was the Iranian born leader of the Lebanese Shia and he "was revered and respected above all others in the Shia world." (Anti-Mullah: Who is the Ayatollah Khomeini?)

Mussa Sadr had refused to accept Khomeini as an ayatollah.

Reportedly, Khomeini was not Iranian.

He"was neither born (in Iran) nor had any Persian blood in his veins at all, paternally or maternally." (Anti-Mullah: Who is the Ayatollah Khomeini?)

Tehran by Hansueli Krapf

The following is based on an article, at, entitled Who is the Ayatollah Khomeini?

1. In 1964 Ayatollah Shariatmadari and Ayatollah Golpayegani gave Khomeini the title of Ayatollah.

Reportedly, they had done this to save Khomeini's life, as Khomeini was facing a charge of treason against the Shah.

And reportedly it was the UK ambassador who had urged that Khomeini be saved.

2. Shariatmadari was higher in the religious hierarchy than Khomeini.

In 1979, Shariatmadari was placed under house arrest.

3. Khomeini's mother was a Kashmiri Indian.

The Iranian Senator Moussavi knew Khomeini's father. Reportedly Khomeini had Moussavi killed.

Reportedly, a story was invented that Khomeini had a Kashmiri Indian father with Iranian origins.

4. Reportedly, Khomeini's real father, was William Richard Williamson, born in Bristol, England, in 1872 of British parents and lineage.

A witness to this was a former Iranian employee of the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company (later BP), who knew the Khomeini family.

In 1979, when Col. Archie Chisholm, a BP political officer and former editor at The Financial Times, was asked about this, he neither confirmed nor denied the story.

William Richard Williamson's biography was written in the early 1950s, by Stanton Hope, a British Journalist and writer who had met Williamson in his home near Basra in the late 1940s. The book title is: Arabian Adventurer: the Story of Haji Williamson


5. Reportedly, Richard Williamson, at the age of 20, was working in South Yemen in the local police force.

"His good looks soon had Sultan Fazl bin-Ali, ruler of Lahej, persuading him to quit the police force to live with him. Richard later left him for another Sheikh, Youssef Ebrahim, a relative of the Al- Sabah family, which rules Kuwait today."

6. In Iran at this time, the British were exploiting the oilfields.

Williamson, now a Moslem, joined British Petroleum as political officer. He called himself Haji Abdollah Fazl Zobeiri.

7. Williamson took holidays in Kashmir and married at least seven times to Arab and Indian women.

His sons attended religious schools.

Reportedly, one son went to the Iranian holy city of Qom and took the name Khomeini.

8. In the early 1960s, Khomeini began to plot against the Shah. In 1964 Khomeini was sentenced to death. By becoming an Ayatollah, his life was saved.

9. Reportedly, in 1979, Khomeini was flown from France to Tehran, with the help of MI6.

The Shah of Iran was toppled by the CIA and MI6?

The mainstream media would like us to believe that the Shah was overthrown by People Power and that the CIA and MI6 were taken by surprise.

However, there is evidence that the CIA and MI6 toppled the Shah because he had become too much of a nationalist, like Nasser, and was not following instructions on oil or even opium.

The CIA did not want left-wing democrats taking over from the Shah as they might not be easy to control. So, reportedly, the CIA allowed the Ayatollahs to take over.

Radio Free Iran claimed that while at Qom, the Ayatollah Khomeini received a "monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, the British."
The British, Muslim Terrorism and September 11


On 19 January 1980, the International Herald Tribune reported that the Shah had said, two years before he was overthrown, that he had heard from two different sources connected with oil companies that the regime in Iran would change.

‘We believe that there was a plan to ensure less oil was offered to the world markets in order to bring about a price,’ said the Shah. ‘One country was to be chosen for the sacrifice... It seems that the country chosen to drop its oil production was mine.’
webgardian: Shah:Oil Companies Helped to Oust Him

The Shah's nationalist policies were making him more popular in Iran and making his country more independent and more powerful. This worried the CIA and MI6.

1. The Shah bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown's own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers. Over one a half million people to became land owners, thus ending the old feudal system.

2.The Shah allowed women the right to vote. He brought an end to the wearing of the veil.

3. He developed plans for a $90 billion nuclear power program.

4. The Shah signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company.

5. He began to close down the opium industry. This had been created during the days of British influence.

'Former intelligence officer' Dr John Coleman considers opium to be of prime importance in the toppling of the Shah (Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 - 6). Dr Coleman is sometimes described as being a conspiracy theorist.

Coleman believes that the US government toppled the Shah of Iran.

He writes:

Why was the Shah deposed...?

In a word, because of DRUGS. The Shah had clamped down and virtually put an end to the immensely lucrative opium trade being conducted out of Iran by the British. At the time that the Shah took over in Iran, there were already one million opium/heroin addicts.

This the British would not tolerate, so they sent the United States to do their dirty work for them in terms of the “special relationship” between the two countries.

When Khomeini took over the U.S. Embassy in Teheran, arms sales by the United States, which had begun with the Shah, were not discontinued...

After 1984, Khomeini’s liberal attitude toward opium had increased the number of addicts to 2 million, according to United Nations and World Health Organization statistics.

Both President Carter and his successor, Ronald Reagan, willingly and with full knowledge of what was at stake, went on supplying arms to Iran even while American hostages languished in captivity...

The arms trade with Iran was sealed at a meeting between Cyrus Vance... and Dr. Hashemi, which resulted in the U.S. Air Force beginning an immediate airlift of arms to Iran, carried on even at the height of the hostage crisis the arms came from U.S. Army stockpiles in Germany and some were even flown directly from the United States with refueling stops at the Azores.

With the advent of Khomeini... opium production skyrocketed. By 1984 Iran’s opium production exceeded 650 metric tons of opium per annum.... Iran presently rivals the Golden Triangle in the volume of opium produced.

The role of the Moslem Brotherhood and the Ayatollahs

The following is taken from

(Sources used in the article: The Biography of Dr. Mohammad Mossadegh,
Killing Hope - U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II, William Blum, 1995
MI6 - Inside the Covert World of Her Majesty's Secret Intelligence Service, Stephen Dorril, 2000)

Prior to World War II, British Intelligence cultivated ties with the Brotherhood through agent Freya Stark, the British adventurer and writer... The Muslim Brotherhood spread throughout the Muslim world and has evolved into something like a Muslim equivalent of the West's Masonic brotherhood...

"According to CIA agent Miles Copeland, the Americans began looking for a Muslim Billy Graham around 1955... When finding or creating a Muslim Billy Graham proved elusive, the CIA began to cooperate with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Muslim mass organization founded in Egypt but with followers throughout the Arab Middle East... This signalled the beginning of an alliance between the traditional regimes and mass Islamic movements against Nasser and other secular forces." (Blum)

The most noteworthy success of the Islamic movement during this time was of course the overthrow of the Shah of Iran and the installation of the Ayatollah Khomeini as the Islamic dictator. British Intelligence had used their contacts with Iran's mullahs and ayatollahs to help overthrow Mossadegh and install the Shah back in 1953, and these contacts were maintained and used again to overthrow the Shah when his regime fell out of favor.

The Establishment history of Iran's Islamic Revolution is that Khomeini's revolt was spontaneous and populist, and that it overthrew a repressive dictatorship that was hated by the people but supported wholeheartedly by the United States. It is true that the Shah's government was not a democracy and that his secret service, trained by the CIA, was one of the most effective intelligence organizations in the world.

But what is not reported is that prior to the British-sponsored massive public relations campaign on behalf of the Ayatollah the government of the Shah was loved by the vast majority of the population.

After taking over from Mossadegh the Shah began to push forward a number of nationalist policies that increased his popularity at home but, in some cases, worried the Anglo-American Establishment.

First, he signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company.

Then in 1963 he pushed forward on a series of popular reforms that became known as the White Revolution.

The Shah evolved into a nationalist whose path paralleled that of Nasser far too much for the Establishment's liking:

- He bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown's own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers, allowing over one a half million people to become land owners and ending the old feudal system.

- He allowed women the right to vote, and brought an end to the wearing of the veil, which were "Westernizing" moves unwelcomed by the religious sector.

- He pushed forward on a $90 billion nuclear power program.

- He moved to shut down the lucrative opium industry that had been created during the days of British Empire control that had been running for a hundred years....

The attack on the Shah's government came through the Muslim Brotherhood and through the mullahs and ayatollahs of Iran, supported and manipulated by British Intelligence...

Dr. John Coleman, a former British Intelligence agent... states in his report on Iran's Islamic Revolution (11) that the Muslim Brotherhood was created by "the great names of British Middle East intelligence" ...and that their mission was to "keep the Middle East backward so that its natural resource, oil, could continue to be looted..."

Dr. Coleman writes that in 1980 the broadcasts of Radio Free Iran divided the enemies of the Shah into four categories: 1. Iranian politicians bought by the Israeli Shin Bet, 2. The CIA's network of agents, 3. The feudal landowners, 4. The Freemasons and the Muslim Brotherhood (viewed as the same enemy).

In his report Dr. Coleman writes that in Iran, "At one time there was even a joke about the mullahs being stamped 'made in Britain.'" When the Shah introduced his plan for modernization in 1963 the Ayatollah Khomeini emerged as the leader of the religious opposition. Up until his exile from Iran in 1964, Khomeini was based at the religious city of Qom. Dr. Coleman relates that Radio Free Iran claimed that while at Qom Khomeini received a "monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, the British."


On February 1st, 1979, two weeks after the Shah's departure, Khomeini made a triumphant return to Iran. The BBC's John Simpson was on the plane that carried him back from Paris. aangirfan: BBC links to MI6?



Alan Peters said...

Greetings friend,

I came to your site through a look at my site statistics and noting visits from yours.

Well done article and a much fairer view of the late Shah, he deserves a much kinder treatment - I knew him personally and can testify to this.

He was quite impressive a man, even with faults we all have, he was head and shoulders above most of those around him on whom he had to rely to run the country.

Perhaps the best judge of him comes in a comparison of the country and system he established and the Mullah one which came to power through his reluctance to shed the blood of some 5,000 people to snuff out the revolution and retain his throne. As proposed by his generals.

Be well, be happy,
Alan Peters

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry to see such nonsense collection of irrelevant information with no reliable sources; propagating lies to show M16 and CIA undefeatable organisations!

As if Ayatollah Khomeinis magnificent, unique character can be terrorized with such accusations.

Why don't you open your eyes and see his brave stands against those whom you call his "masters".

Nevertheless, the purest and most brave soldiers, the soldiers of Khomeini are still fighting against these corrupted western dictatorships.

How can one see black and white the same?! -Well, if you have fed your brain with useless researches and misleading information, here is exactly where you end up - denying the shininess of the bright sun, and getting obsessed with the darkness of baseless false claims; lies.

Anonymous said...

From the sound of it, the last person who commented is not an Iranian. He is clueless as to the historical relevance and factual events mentioned in this article about the one and only ( or maybe after Stalin and Hitler) khomeini who had the mission of total destruction of a country called Iran. This person sounds like a Pakistani or muslim Indian or Bangladeshi who has no touch with the misery khomeini has caused upon 70 million natives of Iran. Kudos from me as an Iranian for your effort to relate all these facts.

Anonymous said...

Don't be sorry
All of us ( Iranians ) Know that Khomeini was a terrorist and he was not competent person for calling Ayatollah .
He was just a surfing man who sat on behind the Iranian People and had a project to decrease Iranian's Power .
You know and me too , he came to kill the iranian young people and doing some tasks for England and MI6 . Don't you see , now England is the most powerful in Iran and is robbering our riches؟

It is better , you open your eyes and see out people situations

Anonymous said...

Load of rubbish. Not factual.
I detest Khomeini, what he stood for and what his regime did to Iran but does it really matter who his father was or what his background was. There is no evidence for his relationship with CIA and M15. We always blame west for whatever happens in our country. Khomeini and his followers are reactionary, extremist, superstitious and opportunists. As simple as that, it has nothing to do with the west, CIA or others.
The fact is he had a strong base among ordinary people (sadly) especially those with some religious background. This is due to the fact that the only channel that was available for any opposition was religious groups as Shah had closed down all progressive and democratic parties. Shah felt safe with religious opposition but very uncomfortable with the democratic opposition (poor judgment).

Anonymous said...

I'm an American with no special knowledge.

But the overwhelming facts & evidence support the conclusion that the U. S. and Britain with an accommodating France helped Khomeini into power for the purpose of keeping Iran backward and an ineffectual regional entity.

(The western elite consider conservative Islam backward.)

That does not mean that Iran was a vassal of these powers after the Iranian Revolution.

Likely, Khomeini used and took advantage of this U. S. and British support to achieve his own ends and purposes.

How many times has a person or group accepted help from others and upon achieving his/their goals then turned the tables against those that helped him achieve power?

The elite often underestimate the will and character (either good or bad) of those they set up in power.

(That is why the new "Obama" model the elite want is of an ineffectual & feckless politician with no real political convictions that can be controlled -- Obama is the template for this kind of politician.)

Today, Iran is going through the tension of religious control and secular, technical modernization.

A deep look at history shows, though, that Islam is not as adverse to technology as the elite would like to think, so this tension is not as much as the elite thought it would be (some factions in Islam are adverse to technology and these are the ones that the West supports).

Arabic numbers and Arabic study and transmission of mathematics. Arabic study of Greek classical knowledge which had been lost in the West are examples -- there are many more.

The present course of the West in relation to Iran is a box canyon (a American west expression for "no way out") leading to war -- this is a mistake.

There is much distrust in Iran for the West (for good reasons).

On the other hand (for Iranians reading this comment), please do not play into the hands of those in the West who want war with Iran. The Persian People have a great history and are at a geographical cross-roads of the world. Iran can play a constructive and self-benefiting role in that part of the world (and beyond).

The hard-core Zionists (not all Zionists want war with Iran) want war with Iran to cause chaos in the region so they can then attempt to attain a so-called "greater Israel". These people don't want peace because then their failure to settle and accommodate with the Palestinians (a two state solution) is unsupportable.

But with chaos and war, their intransigence and aggression becomes acceptable.

It is very important to know the true history. But it is even more important to use that knowledge for the benefit of peace, justice, and human dignity for all men regardless of religious, ethnic, or political differences.

The Middle East can be a dynamic and economically strong and independent part of the world with sovereignty & independence for each Nation-State in the region or something else entirely.

It is up to men of good will reaching out to other men of good will to seek peace, justice, and human dignity.

War is not the way to achieve those ends. Don't let the warmongers win -- regardless of which country they reside in.

avles said...

CIA is a Roman Catholic creation via SMOM and Jesuit order. Economical justification are just what they are, alibi to destroy secularism in the world making it appear fruit of "Zionist" and "American" aggression. Crown of England is always the "defender of the Vatican" and the manager of Vatican property in the world, especially the one named: USA.

Site Meter