Friday, December 13, 2013

HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GAY, LESBIAN, BISEXUAL OR HETEROSEXUAL?




According to psychologist Laurent Bègue, author of Right and Wrong Psychology, the line between homophobia and homosexuality is thin.

I suppose that most of us used to fear gay people.

We imagined that they smelt differently.

We thought that gay people would destroy our society.

We had an image of gay people as being rather foreign and dangerous, like Blacks, Jews, Catholics,  Moslems or Germans.



And then we discovered that our best friend at school was secretly gay, and quite harmless.

And then we discovered that some of our best friends at University were secretly gay, and quite harmless.

And the student, who was the same sex as us, and who had just slept with a married person of the opposite sex from Paris, wanted to be affectionate towards us. 

We were not interested and they departed but we had learnt a bit more about bisexuality

And then one of our professors seemed to imply that all the great men of history were apparently bisexual, from Alexander the Grape to Ronald Reagan.

And then we traveled a bit, and, while traveling on exotic airlines, rich and successful married men would tell us that that they liked girls, but preferred boys.



It is difficult to spot a gay man.

But often they are conservative and like sport and the military.

In Sam Mendes' film American Beauty, a former US marine and convinced conservative makes sexual advances towards the character played by Kevin Spacey.

The marine, who is homophobic, shoots Spacey after his advances are rejected.


German Bishop Walter Mixa was violently homophobic.

Now there are widespread allegations that he is totally gay. 


American televangelist Ted Haggard is the typical gay homophobe.



Researchers from the University of Georgia carried out an experiment using a device that measured male erections.

A gay scene was shown to males who claimed to be homophobic and to males who claimed not to be homophobic..

80% of the homophobes had an increase in penis size when shown the gay scene.

34% of the non-homophobes had an increase in penis size when shown the gay scene.




How many people are gay, or bisexual?

Apparently, the typical 'gay' person is married to someone of the opposite sex.



One recent piece of research, involving over 50,000 people, found that:

 33% of those polled considered themselves to be exclusively heterosexual.

 67% considered themselves not-exclusively heterosexual.

67% is No Minority!

0Exclusively heterosexual
1Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6Exclusively homosexual
The above research used the Kinsey Scale (above)

A recent survey of 2,516 people in the USA found that:

27 percent of participants had had same-sex experiences.

19 percent of participants indicated that they did not consider themselves heterosexual.

The research, was carried out by Ohio State University and Boston University and was published by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Is the Gay Population a Lot Bigger Than Even Kinsey Predicted?

We should note that:

1. Many people still hide their true feelings when being surveyed.

2. Many Americans have 'gay' inclinations, but, have never had any 'gay' sexual experience with another person.

3. Most Americans are bisexual by inclination.




One of the problems with the 1948 Kinsey Report (Sexual Behavior in the Human Male - Kinsey, 1948) was that back in the 1940s, most Americans were reluctant to tell the truth about their sexuality.

Kinsey took sex histories from more than 18,000 people

These people may not all have all been entirely representative of the population and may not all have told the truth.

Gebhard and Johnson of the Kinsey Institute for Sex Research have now removed the data from any of the surveyed men who had been in prison or who had been male prostitutes.

Lesbian couple

According to the Kinsey Institute, about 60 per cent of pre-adolescent boys engaged in homosexual activities.

Sexual Behavior in the Human Male

Gebhard and Johnson reported that 36.4% of men had had at least one homosexual experience.

For working-class males in the Kinsey sample, the incidence of homosexuality was higher than 50 percent.

Kinsey Reports - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



When it comes to sexual behaviour, far too many Americans go to extremes.

Reportedly, the father of the sex-researcher Alfred Kinsey was a "bullying, violently repressed bigot" who was "brutally punished for masturbating when he was an adolescent".

(New Statesman - It's everywhere: just don't talk about it)

In other words, you could argue that Alfred Kinsey's father had been affected by the Jewish thinking of the Old Testament, which condemns masturbation, homosexuality and many other things.



According Kinsey's research, most humans do not fall exclusively into heterosexual or homosexual classifications but somewhere between. (Some recent scientific research has suggested that most people are bisexual.)


Judith Reisman

Judith Reisman is the daughter of Jewish communists and a friend of right-wing Christians.

According to Judith Reisman, Alfred Kinsey may have been a bad guy who behaved badly towards boys.

(The Culture Wars. Who Know? / The Truth Seeker - The Case Against Kinsey).

None of Kinsey’s four biographers have turned up any evidence that Kinsey abused children.


Certain Jewish guys do not like Kinsey!

If people feel less guilty about masturbation or homosexuality or oral sex, then they are less easy to control?

In 1996, in Georgia in the USA, 17-year-old Wendy Whitaker broke the law by having oral sex with a boy who was almost 16.

(Sex laws: Unjust and ineffective)

Wendy ended up spending a year in jail and she got put on a sex offenders register which the public can view online.

A local television station featured Wendy in an item on local sex offenders, broadcasting a map showing where she lives.



Journalist Johann Hari tells us that "Kinsey's agenda was simple and brave: to eradicate sexual shame and melt sexual taboos.

"His own life was littered with the victims of Judaeo-Christian sexual repression."

(New Statesman - It's everywhere: just don't talk about it)



But, in America there is now too much porn and extremism.

Johann Hari refers to the 'ubiquity of porn'.

According to Johann Hari

(New Statesman - It's everywhere: just don't talk about it ):

"Leslee J Unruh is the poster girl for the Christian anti-porn mullahs.

"She is the sassy, aggressive leader of America's Abstinence Clearinghouse, an evangelical group that has been leading pickets of Kinsey (the film) across the US.

'"Kinsey should be looked upon in the history books as Hitler, as Saddam Hussein,' she explained last month, adding that internet porn is 'turning America into Sodom and Gomorrah'.



"This voice has become louder and clearer since George W Bush's 'moral values' re-election, and it has its British representatives in Melanie Phillips and the Daily Mail."

Johann Hari and Melanie Phillips are reportedly Jewish.

They do not necessarily say much about the Jewish link to porn.



In The Jewish Quarterly, winter 2004, Jewish professor Nathan Abrams documents the leading role of Jews in pornography.

"A story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood’s seedier cousin, the adult film industry...there’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews played (and still continue to play) a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America.

"Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the ‘true blue’ Jews."


Reisman

Kinsey was no saint.

But this does does not invalidate his group's research.

One person has claimed that Kinsey knew Dr. Ewen Cameron (MK ULTRA scientist), but they provide no source.

ln June 1994, the court dismissed Reisman's case with prejudice.

The 'lies' about Kinsey come from the notorious Judith Reisman.

There was a court case concerning Reisman's accusations against Kinsey.

In September 1993, Reisman's lawyer withdrew from the case, and in June 1994 the court dismissed Reisman's case with prejudice.


Reisman and butterflies.

Kinsey had interviewed a very large number of people and at least one of them happened to be a pedophile who had stimulated a young child and this testimony was recorded by Kinsey.

Kinsey did not carry out experiments on children.

Judith Reisman is "a wingnut social conservative."


Reisman

Reisman's own ten year old daughter was molested by a thirteen year old.

The molestation of children is said to be common among certain Jewish families.

Reisman's daughter developed deep depression, perhaps as the result of the reaction of her mother.

Reisman seems to have decided that her daughter's early death was due to Kinsey's attempts to tell the truth about sex.



In 1984, Alfred Regnery, a conservative publisher, gave Reisman $734,371 to study the content of Playboy magazines between 1954 and 1984. 

When she handed in her findings at American University, where she was based, the university refused to publish them.

Regnery confessed the grant was a mistake.

"This is not science, it's vigilantism: paranoid, pseudoscientific hyperbole with a thinly veiled, hidden agenda. This kind of thing doesn't help children at all," Dr. Loretta Haroian, a leading expert on childhood sexuality, said of Reisman's report.

Her Kinsey Obsession | Alternet

18 comments:

Andrew Llewellyn said...

Alfred kinsey, is he not the most notorious child abuser and the father of so called sexual liberation.
Andy

Anon said...

No, there is no evidence that Kinsey was a child abuser.

None of Kinsey’s four biographers have turned up any evidence that Kinsey abused children.

Kinsey has been attacked by the people who want to divide and rule.

Kenny said...

In the Kinsey studies he sexually stimulated 133 month old children! fact. He was also a wife swapper and Bi-sexual. Hardly impartial

Andrew Llewellyn said...

Sorry but experimenting with sex on children is abuse , no other way to define that!

Anonymous said...

It is well-known that Kinsey had an agenda and his statistics have been thoroughly discredited. He asked his researchers to question people in he vicinity of gay clubs and bars. Also, his questionnaire asked people to place themselves on his scale, but it wasn't well conceived -- for example, one level of it was 'I often find members of my own sex attractive'. This is ambiguous, and is not the same as 'I often feel sexually attracted to members of my own sex'.
Much other research has be done, using better techniques (truth drugs, remote observation etc.) and returns a fairly consistent statistic of around 10 per cent.

Anon said...

The 'lies' about Kinsey come from the notorious Judith Reisman.

There was a court case concerning Reisman's accusations against Kinsey .

In September 1993, Reisman's lawyer withdrew from the case, and in June 1994 the court dismissed Reisman's case with prejudice.

Kinsey had interviewed a very large number of people and at least one of them happened to be a pedophile who had stimulated a young child and this testimony was recorded by Kinsey.

Kinsey did not carry out experiments on children.

Judith Reisman is "a wingnut social conservative."

Reisman's own ten year old daughter was molested by a thirteen year old.

The molestation of children is said to be common among certain Jewish families.

Reisman's daughter developed deep depression, perhaps as the result of the reaction of her mother.

Reisman seems to have decided that her daughter's early death was due to Kinsey's attempts to tell the truth about sex.

In 1984, Alfred Regnery, now a prominent conservative publisher, gave Reisman $734,371 to analyze the content of Playboy magazines between 1954 and 1984. When she turned in her findings at American University, where she was based, the university refused to publish them.

Regnery confessed the grant was a mistake.

"This is not science, it's vigilantism: paranoid, pseudoscientific hyperbole with a thinly veiled, hidden agenda. This kind of thing doesn't help children at all," Dr. Loretta Haroian, a leading expert on childhood sexuality, said of Reisman's report.

- Aangirfan

Anonymous said...

Who financially supported and sponsored Kinsey? As is stated so often: "Follow the money."

It seems Aangirfan has drawn a conclusion from their excellent reporting on the sex ring cases in Britain and America.

The conclusion: Normalize homosexuality and there would be a lot less personal conduct that could be subject to blackmail, control, and manipulation by the elite.

Possibly, but likely that will never happen. There likely will always be people who disapprove of homosexuality because of specific religious injunctions or because of their belief in Natural Law that homosexuality is an aberration, a deviation, from normal heterosexuality. Also, much of the 'blackmail' material stems from sexual abuse of children.

What are you going to do? Normalize pedophilia?

Persecute those with religious or Natural Law objections to the indoctrination of children & teenagers that homosexuality is normal?

Use the communist tactic of enforcing "politically correct" words & ideas on society?

Smear anybody who disagrees with the homosexual agenda tactic of claiming "all people are bisexual, they just don't know it yet", as being homophobic?

Keep your sexual activities private and few will care one way or another.

Promote an agenda of normalizing homosexuality, especially to children and teenagers, and you are guaranteed to cause deep division in society, that is non-reconcilable.

As example: Two groups of people have similar politics concerning economic issues and/or corporate responsibility issues, but are forever "divided" over the issue of promoting homosexuality as normal... which leads to teaching children and teenagers that homosexuality is normal (again, claiming bisexuality as normal is a backdoor way of claiming homosexuality is normal, as most people subscribe to the idea that "bisexuality" is a non-exclusive type of homosexuality).

Just what the controllers want.

It's amazing how effective the controllers' meme can be in terms of making somebody into a tool of the controllers' agenda, promoting the "controllers" ideas, even if they are aware of the controllers' agenda and object to it in principle.

The controllers count on that and as one commenter on this website noted, sex is the controllers' biggest weapon against the Common Man.

Anon said...

The controllers in countries such as the USA and Iran have always promoted the idea that most people are heterosexual; and that bisexuality is abnormal.

Yet the animal and human kingdoms have always been mainly bisexual.

You will find that the chief opponents of the truth are Jewish people like Reisman and Christian fundamentalists like Ted Haggard.

Kinsey is a bit of a Red Herring.

Some research shows that he greatly underestimated the number of bisexual people.

This blog wants people to know the truth, whether it's about the Shah being toppled by the CIA or about Castro working for the CIA.

"Forty-year-old Lisa, who discovered her husband with another man five years into her marriage, was told by her counsellor that 99% of men are homosexual and they only marry to have children."

- The Times of India

Dublinmick said...

In my estimation there are few lesbians I could not put back on the right path.

Anonymous said...

Small explosion in Cathedral Quarter in Belfast

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-25372680

Anonymous said...

ANOTHER DAY, ANOTHER DRILL/HOAX

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/12/13/21893157-gunman-kills-self-at-colorado-high-school-two-other-students-shot?lite

Anonymous said...

People who dominate the sex agenda will also dominate in other ways. I count my aesthetic purity as a gift of clarity. The complications of my opposite gender were quite enough.from frozen Alberta, r. olausen

dognamedblue said...

basically a man will stick his penis anywhere he can get away with it
women, men, children [other species, fruit]
as a man, once you accept this you can then do something to control that urge, and make your own personal choice as to where you want to stick it
although many will still think it is some kind of magic wand that can control everything it touches {muggles}

Carol A. Valentine said...


Only God knows the truth.


Carol A. Valentine

Anonymous said...

Raising the age of consent is good for children, and humankind, in my opinion. This is a matter of promoting health and development from a practical and spiritual point of view.
The young mind, spirit and body should be allowed to develop fully as an individual before merging with another.
Sex has a powerful impact, and the young person is ill equipped to comprehend; separate self from the experience and make a conscious choice to be or not to be oneself, and then choose one's life instead of being a vessel for others' desires or aims.

Anonymous said...

Feeling for someone of your own gender. There is a word for that.
It is called friendship.

But friendship and sex are different things.

Sex is part of your animal nature. Like thirst, or hunger, or rage, or jealousy.
All have their uses but you are not a slave to them.
Many people in fact spend one month every year achieving mastery over the animal aspect of their nature.

As a reproductive strategy, sorry, homosexuality is demonstratively suboptimal.
If you're lucky, you may have occasional, incidental parthenogenesis but mostly it's non-productive.
Not a great way to perpetuate a species. You may not like it, but this is biological fact.

Women and men are clearly made for each other. Equal yet different, complementary and natural companions.
Intended to treat each other with mutual love and respect. To feel for one another.

It is the measure of a healthy society that men care about the concerns of women.
And that women care about the concerns of men. That they feel empathy for each other.
That one can put her- or himself in the shoes of the other.

There is no shortage of pathological human societies and cultures where this is not the case.
Ones saturated in pornography degrading to women, where exploitation is treated as inevitable.
Ones where women are culturally encouraged, not as much to be independent, but to hold men in contempt.
Ones where men are considered to be rapists by default, not friends and protectors of women.
Ones where women are second class citizens, kept in a position of dependence.
Covered up in a manner that more resembles shame than modesty, not free to choose their own friends or husband.
Absurdly, forbidden from driving even, by clerics who invent their own rules and blasphemously claim said rules to be of divine origin.

A woman caring about the concerns of men does not make her butch.
A man caring about the concerns of women does not make him effeminate.
It simply makes them decent people.

Anyway, it is a real loss to yourself to treat the opposite sex in a superficial, utilitarian and selfish manner.
Most of my best friends have been women. Their external beauty pales in comparison to the beauty of their inner lives.
You talk to a woman, about her hopes and plans, her children, her friends, husband, interests, studies, work.
You realize every woman is unique, a universe unto herself.

It must also be gratifying for a woman to learn that men are real humans too, just like herself.
If you cut them, they also bleed.

---
"Couple of blokes playing pool at the pub.
'Ya know, I was reading this article on how to give your wife a bigger orgasm.'
'What? Mate, are you gay or something?'
Um, maybe you see the irony in this."
---
[Continued...]

Anonymous said...

[Continued...]

Anyway, humans are capable of much more than simply having a sexual preference.

And reality is nuanced. Strong affection for a same-sex friend is not shameful.
But licentious Grindr-fuelled self-gratification, devoid of affection or care, is.

Love tending to lust is the least of sins.

But pride, arrogance, the belief that others are mere tools for your selfish gratification, is the worst of sins.
The root of all evils.

So why do so many of the most vitriolic haters of homosexuals turn out to be homosexual themselves?
Because what people most fear and hate in others is what they most fear and hate in themselves.
Ultimately, every atom of good or evil in their souls will be laid bare. They will have no place to hide.
If they knew this, they might not be so eager to cast the first stone.

One other thing, Aangirfan, your peace-love-and-mungbeans attitude here seems to ignore some obvious social perils.
Marriage is a sacred contract, a trust. A means of mutual support, and specifically for the raising of children.
Something to bring joy and comfort and smooth out the vicissitudes of life.

Breaking the contract has consequences.

Mostly obviously, lies, distrust, dishonesty. Cheapening of human relationships.
Also increase in disease and misery, through the simple mathematics of venereal epidemiology.
All well and good until antibiotics and anti-retrovirals are no longer effective.
Also the irresponsible creation of unwanted children, who may be unloved, uncared for, abandoned. Or worse.

Now think. What do you think is a fair punishment for wrecking a child's life?

I can see you thrashing about with your difficult moral analyses. So let me cut through the complexity.
The morality of sexual behaviour is like the morality of other behaviours:

What is selfish is evil.
What is selfless is good.

And each of us given a different hand, our infinitely variegated and fallible lives are a watercolour mixture of both.

---
"And, no, it is not dangerous to confuse children with angels."

Anon said...

Many thanks for all the comments. The last one was particularly thoughtful.

- Aangirfan

 
Site Meter