Sunday, September 01, 2013

MOSSAD LIED; TROODOS IN CYPRUS DID NOT PICK UP ANYTHING IMPLICATING ASSAD


The UK's listening post on Mount Troodos in Cyprus which did not pick up any messages implicating Assad in the gas attack.

Former UK ambassador Craig Murray tells us about The Troodos Conundrum

The UK has the best spy equipment in the region of Syria and yet it failed to pick up any evidence implicating Assad in the gas attack in Damascus.

Craig Murray writes:

"The GCHQ listening post on Mount Troodos in Cyprus monitors all radio, satellite and microwave traffic across the Middle East...

"Even almost all landline telephone communication in this region is routed through microwave links at some stage, picked up on Troodos...

Craig Murray

"I should state that I have actually been inside all of this facility and been fully briefed on its operations and capabilities, while I was head of the FCO Cyprus Section in the early 1990s...

"It is therefore very strange, to say the least, that John Kerry claims to have access to communications intercepts of Syrian military and officials ... which intercepts were not available to the British Joint Intelligence Committee."

In other words, Israel's Mossad lied when it claimed that it had picked up Syrian military officials asking about the chemical attack.



Craig Murray writes: 

"Israel has repeatedly been involved in the Syrian civil war, carrying out a number of illegal bombings and missile strikes over many months. 

" This absolutely illegal activity by Israel- which has killed a great many civilians, including children - has brought no condemnation at all from the West. 

"Israel has now provided “intelligence” to the United States designed to allow the United States to join in with Israel’s bombing and missile campaign.

"The answer to the Troodos Conundrum is simple. 

"Troodos did not pick up the intercepts because they do not exist. 

" Mossad fabricated them. 

" John Kerry’s “evidence” is the shabbiest of tricks. 

" More children may now be blown to pieces by massive American missile blasts. 

" It is nothing to do with humanitarian intervention. It is, yet again, the USA acting at the behest of Israel."



8 comments:

Anonymous said...

pastebin.com/zeXpsRnh

#OPPentagonhack

boards.4chan.org/pol/res/19774990

OFFICER RECORD BRIEF COMPLETE

ALL CONTACTS TO COL DEPTH CHIEF STAFF

1000 Army Pentagon

--- more to come ---

Anonymous said...

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/08/31/321478/obama-decides-us-should-attack-syria/

Anonymous said...

I would seem that the buildup is having little impact and death toll increased to make story "jazzy. When Tv addicts physically move off the sofa and manually turn off the set its not working. Our boys deserve better. Boots on ground or not everyone has jaws on ground because of total disregard for the process or results. Has the American president cut a deal exchanging blood for personal gain? Who would be shocked?

Anonymous said...

Hullo Aang,

Well, there's a funny thing!

I don't know if you keep track of Craig Murray's comments (I tend not to since he's so infested with shills) but if you have a look in this piece, We Won’t Be Fooled Again, and scroll down about a quarter of the way you'll see a certain somebody was precisely goading Craig to admit to the distinct possibility of false flag. And further down you'll see Craig replied.

Admittedly it was a soft-as-shite reply, as is Craig's wont (ie. simultaneously dismissing and then re-entertaining the prospect of Assad as a logic-less inviter of his own demise), and further, this new piece likewise refuses to step across the obvious line that the whole gassing was an act of deliberate mass slaughter (and all to plant a false flag at the top of the pile of bodies), but still! It's not too terrible.

Of course it would be nice if Craig were then to go on and ask the obvious questions: If there's no evidence of Syrian complicity in these gassings apart from deliberate forgeries, then who did do it? Cui Bono is a fair question, so I don't see why Craig couldn't entertain it.

Hmm... me channelling Craig: "If we were the police and had in our custody a chap whom we knew falsely and deliberately blamed another for a murder, wouldn't our first thought as to the identity of the actual murderer be the man we'd caught making a deliberate false allegation? That would stand to reason wouldn't it?"

Not forgetting of course that Craig knows a lot of spooks. He says so in the article. And to be honest a fellow can't know that many spooks without he is one. Whether Craig's problem is that he is a proper spook, or just doesn't wish to offend his friends who are, there's only ever going to be so much value in him.

Regardless he does have his moments!

best etc. etc.

Anonymous said...

Mossad Lied! really? isn't their motto "By way of deception thou shalt do war"

brian said...

somethings never change: Obama is Bush mark 2(smarter model) dejavu Bush 'Now watch thisdrive!' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCm9788Tb5g the Golfwar ................Fox News ‏@FoxNews 3h
Obama goes golfing after deciding on Syria military strike http://fxn.ws/18fJspO : the candidate for change you can believe in!

brian said...

Pope should xcommunicate any catholics who take part in war on syria
tweet that to @pontifex popes tweet it has differnt language versions eg @pontifex_es

Anonymous said...

Fake conversation contrived between the israeli attackers and the Mavi Marmara crew which mossad leaked after the incident in IDF defence,is a classic indicator of "by deception thou shall wage war" devils'.

http://talknic.wordpress.com/2010/06/05/faking-it-for-israel-again-pathetic-propaganda-101-alleged-remarks-from-the-mavi-marmara/

 
Site Meter