On 25 February 2013, in a court in the UK, Tony Rooke related that the 'BBC has covered up the facts about 9/11'.
Outside the court.
Professor Michel Chossudovsky, at Global Research, relates:
Historic 911 Court Case: Through Media Disinformation, BBC Supports “The Practice of Terrorism”
"With the exception of London’s Daily Mail, the British mainstream media, including The Guardian and the Independent, chose to abstain from coverage or commentary of this historic court case, which points to a criminal process of media disinformation by the BBC.
"The BBC chose to “cover up its own coverup.”
"This is one among a string of BBC media fabrications including fake images and video footage.
"We will recall that in August 2011, the BBC showed fake video footage of Libyans celebrating 'Liberation' in Tripoli’s Green square, following NATO’s humanitarian bombings. Oops.
Rooke was not allowed to show his video evidence in court because the Judge said it was not relevant to the trial.
"The main point Rooke said he relied upon was that the BBC reported that World Trade Centre 7 had fallen 20 minutes before it did.
"He also made reference to a theory about the way the skyscraper was said to have fallen in on itself, which some people believe showed signs of a controlled demolition.
"Mr Rooke said: 'The BBC reported it 20 minutes before it fell. They knew about it beforehand."
"Last time I was here I asked you (the judge): “Were you aware of World Trade Centre 7”?
"‘You said you had heard of it. Ten years later you should have more than heard of it.
"It's the BBC's job to inform the public. Especially of miracles of science and when laws of physics become suspended."
"‘They have made programmes making fools of and ridiculing those of us who believe in the laws of gravity. American reports have shown that the fall was nothing but a controlled demolition.
"‘I am not looking at who demolished it - that is impossible - but the BBC actively tried to hide this from the public.'
"...The court called in back-up from Sussex Police with two officers standing at the door to the court and several more outside. There was cheering and applause as Rooke put his case forward in court."
District Judge Stephen Nicholls said: 'This is not a public inquiry into 9/11. This is an offence under section 363 of the Communications Act.'
CIA banks on 'B-Company' as Indian Mujahideen oust Dawood as CIA's go-to terror outfit