Friday, September 09, 2011

FLIGHT 93 LANDED IN CLEVELAND


Both the 9 11 plot and the Operation Northwoods plot involved the switching of aircraft.

In the Pentagon's Operation Northwoods:

The plan was to "simultaneously send up two airliners painted and numbered exactly the same, one from a civil airport in America, the other from a secret military airbase nearby.

"The one from the airport would have military personnel on board who had checked in as ordinary passengers under false names.

"The one from the airbase would be an empty drone, a remote-controlled unmanned aircraft.

"Somewhere along their joint flight paths, the passenger-carrying plane would drop below radar height, and disappear, landing back at the airbase and unloading its occupants in secret.

"Meanwhile, the drone would have taken up the other plane’s designated course..."

(Source: 9 11 REVEALED - The Daily Mail)



On 8 September 2011, we read about the 9 11 plan:

Flight 93 in two places at once on 911?

"On the morning of 9/11 a little known Cincinnati television station ran a story saying Flight 93 landed at Cleveland International Airport instead of crashing in Pennsylvania as claimed in the official government story.

"Reporters at WCPO Channel 9 quoted then Cleveland Mayor Michael R. White as saying 'a Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing due to a bomb threat,' the airplane landing safely, moved to a secure location and evacuated."

"The morning of 9/11 a report came out from WCPO-TV that told of a plane being forced to land at Cleveland Hopkins Airport in Ohio at 10:45am.

"United Airlines had identified the plane as one of their own - Flight 93." (source: GRAND THEFT COUNTRY)

Full story here: Flight 93 in two places at once on 911?

Mike Philbin Blog

8 comments:

NO ONE TO VOTE FOR said...

The problem with this narrative is that passengers on Flight 93 would then, necessarily, have to have been 'disposed of' by some persons working for the 9/11 perpetrators.

This is more unthinkable to most people even than the basic allegation that 9/11 was an 'inside job'.

Anonymous said...

http://news.yahoo.com/interim-pm-warns-libya-battle-not-over-000007498.html

http://news.yahoo.com/insight-chinas-war-terror-widens-xinjiangs-ethnic-divide-004701719.html

http://news.yahoo.com/trial-john-edwards-pushed-back-january-223712372.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2035142/German-police-Berlin-arrest-men-suspected-organising-bomb-plot-buying-chemicals.html

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/198049.html

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/198139.html

http://uruknet.info/?p=m81238&hd=&size=1&l=e

http://uruknet.info/?p=m81217&hd=&size=1&l=e

http://takimag.com/article/too_many_inconvenient_truths/print#axzz1XEJgcC1x

C

Anonymous said...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/sep/07/tony-hayward-windfall-kurdistan

C

Franz said...

The landings at Cleveland have caused much confusion:

http://911review.org/inn.globalfreepress/Cleveland_Airport_Mystery.html

But note that NASA has a research facility there, and it's been there since before NASA. It has a VERY spooky history. Formerly the Lewis Research Center, now named after John Glenn.

IF THE 200 MISSING PASSENGERS REALLY WERE TAKEN TO NASA... maybe they were all NASA people to begin with? NASA is part of the Security State despite being tagged as a "civilian" agency.

Even the "official" take on the NASA research facility includes some smellies:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Research_Center

As it says there, it's Plum Brook Station has "...the world's only facility capable of testing full-scale upper-stage launch vehicles and rocket engines under simulated high-altitude conditions. The PBS Space Power Facility (SPF) houses the world's largest space environment vacuum chamber. PBS also has cryogenic test facilities and a hypersonic wind tunnel..."

That's a lot of potential for harm in a tightly secure location.

brian said...

FYI aangirfan
http://thesantosrepublic.com/2011/07/exclusive-official-documented-truth-debunking-biased-icc-on-gaddafi/

nobody said...

Hey Aang, are you a Dave McGowan fan? (Like I'm an Aangir fan, ha ha ha). Of all the 911 breakdowns I like his the best. And I recall him going through the witness statements for 93 and unlike the way-too-suspect witnesses at the Pentagon the Shanksville witnesses were really quite compelling. They were all long-time locals with no connection to the MIC who variously related hearing explosions or sighting debris. I could be wrong on the precise details. It's been a while. But regardless I recall it being quite convincing, not least of which because it was completely at odds with the government narrative. That and the fact that the FBI then proceeded to threaten everyone with dire repercussions if they talked about it. The usual story.

Otherwise, under this replacement narrative I'm sort of required to view the government as squeamish or something. They ain't. They're the death cult! The more dead the better. They'd happily kill thousands if it got the job done. Hell, they'd do it even if it didn't! For someone like Dubya I doubt he could even get a boner without there was someone's death involved in it.

Still! I wouldn't write this off utterly. I'd just need an explanation as to why the government would baulk at killing a bunch of innocents. And on the grounds of something other than human decency, because God knows they haven't got any.

Anon said...

NO ONE TO VOTE FOR commented:

"The problem with this narrative is that passengers on Flight 93 would then, necessarily, have to have been 'disposed of' by some persons working for the 9/11 perpetrators."

My comment is that the passengers may all have links to the Pentagon.

No need to dispose of them.

Nobody commented:

"I'm sort of required to view the government as squeamish or something. They ain't. They're the death cult! The more dead the better. They'd happily kill thousands if it got the job done."

- Aangirfan

John Friend said...

Aangirfan quotes the local Cleveland report:

"Reporters at WCPO Channel 9 quoted then Cleveland Mayor Michael R. White as saying 'a Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing due to a bomb threat,' the airplane landing safely, moved to a secure location and evacuated."

The problem with this is that Flight 93 was a Boeing 757, not a Boeing 767 as this report states.

I'm starting to think that virtually everything about 9/11 is made up, including the Boeing 757s/767s. There is no evidence/debris of any of these airplanes on 9/11 at any of the sites (WTC 1 & 2, Pentagon, and Shanksville). It also appears that some of the "victims" on Flight 93 were fakes, too. Just like that Hollywood movie they made, United 93, which has served to perpetuate the official myth of 9/11. People psychologically refuse to question major events when victims are involved. It's a major part of the 9/11 psyop.

 
Site Meter