Saturday, January 01, 2011

PREDICTIONS 2011

Anna
Anna, by Anastasiya Lazurenko All Rights Reserved

Some predictions for 2011.

(Our predictions are often wrong)

1. China will continue to prosper.

2. Oil will be at least $100 a barrel.

This will only benefit oil producing countries which are 'independent'.

3. The Euro will survive.

4. The 'economy' will slowly recover.



5. Some food prices will rise sharply.

6. There will be continuing unrest in parts of Europe, and elsewhere. Provocateurs will be at work.

7. Some banks will not be propped up, and bondholders in these banks will suffer.

8. There will be continuing attempts by the CIA and its friends to influence events in key states such as Turkey, Pakistan, Algeria, India, Egypt ...

More Moslems will be recruited by the CIA and its friends.

9. Bloggers who try to criticise the status quo will find themselves increasingly sidelined by blogs promoting disinformation. Search engines will increasingly promote commercial junk.

10. The public will continue to be conned by CIA psy-ops.

~~

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dont be redicolous Ang. the € will not survive.It will die eventually and all the €urofascist satanic rituals with it.

Happy new year!

Penny said...

Happy New Year!!
best to you and yours

Anonymous said...

Predictions 1-8 are in many ways big and out of our control.

9-10 are somewhat in our control, we can have an impact on those.

You do a great job Aang, many of us can do more.

Anonymous said...

Could you please prepare and post a short guide for your readers on where to find the best information and writing (sans wild innuendo, leaps of logic or guilt by six degrees of separation) on Wikileaks as a psy-ops.

So many distinguished and dissident bloggers have been hoodwinked by the Assange phenomenon
that this doesn't bode well for the coming year.

I think you are spot on about the sidelining of bloggers criticizing the status quo. Some may even be taken out entirely by new legislation being
prepared in the USA now as a result of Wikileakage.

How do you account for the disparity in the sophistication of cyber warfare compared to the intelligence services' continuing dumbass recruiting of dumbass Muslim patsies?

chuckyman said...

Happy New Year Aangirfan. Thank you for all your hard work

I sincerely hope the fortunes of all of humanity improve in the year ahead.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous,

The following are good sources on Wikileaks: William Engdahl, Wayne Madsen and veteranstoday.com.

But don't simply trust them:

There's also plenty of public information on Wikileaks.

For example, look at their history, who funded them, who's on their board and their affiliations (eg. National Endowment for Democracy (i.e. CIA)). And, of course, what patent lies are they pushing. Assange is infamous for his statements on 911, for the media outlets he leaks to (NYT, Guardian, Spiegel), for the remarkable absence of any substantive leaks that are not in support of DoD objectives, for the inexplicable lack of leaks on Israel despite their flagrant and frequent crimes, and of course for the utter blatant theatre of the rape accusations.

It's quite possible Assange really is just a dupe, rather than a Macchiavellian operator. Such stupidity is not rare, particularly if there's money involved to cloud judgment. And there is. Lots.

Assange may or may not understand his masters. In particular, he may at some point be more valuable dead than alive.

Also...

And this is important.

... look into who owns the various media companies Assange is dealing with, including his new book publishers. Look into the initial funders.

Anyone with the least interest in the truth will see a clear pattern emerge.

In short, yes, the zionist billionaires really do form a discreet, interlocked power structure that exerts vast influence, especially on the worldview of the West. Like the pull of a dark star.

After just a little research, you should be familiar with the Sulzbergers, Grahams, Bronfmans, Murdochs, Redstones, Saatchis, etc. And also the Greenbergs, Crowns, Rothschilds, George Soros, Larry Fink, Marcus Agius, David Rubenstein, and others. Even ignoring the svengalis of the media, financial and weapons worlds, there have been many zionists with intellectual influence in the "cerebral cortices" of Western power: RAND, DARPA, Hudson Institute, the Committee on the Present Danger, Aspen Institute, Center for Strategic and International Studies. Yehezkel Dror is an excellent exponent.

There is a wider game happening here. The Wikileaks psyop is just a very small part of it.

This wider game is best understood after reading Zbigniew Brzezinki's "The Grand Chessboard" and reviewing maps of resources, especially oil, and current/proposed pipelines and tanker routes.

Essentially, 911 and various other false flags and psyops are intended to hamstring Chinese access to oil and trade routes, and prevent cooperation between Russia and France-Germany, and others such as India and Pakistan.

Zbig is a Rockefeller servant, and despite protests to the contrary, is very much on the same page as the zionists.

Zbig even clearly states the reasons for the West's slide into police states: "democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization".

Their objective is no less than this:

Full spectrum planetary domination with no possibility of resistance to their tyranny.

If Eurasia worked together to bring down the NATO partners, it's not clear they would be any better.

History, it seems, is a continuing struggle to balance one monstrous leviathan against another, and whatever is good in mankind tries to avoid being stomped in the process.

And this good eventually wins and rebuilds on the ruins.

Yes, the meek will inherit the Earth.

-- the *other* Anonymous

PS. You astutely noted that Wikileaks is also an excuse to suppress the free Internet. Very Hegelian: thesis, antithesis, synthesis.

PPS. Many of the "muslim" patsies are involuntary and blackmailed into helping, often criminals involved in the CIA's drug trade. (Look at Kosovo, essentially a pure CIA narcostate.) But, yep, they're still dumbasses.

Honk Bonk Man said...

Have a great new year Aangirfan!

Anonymous said...

Hello Anon 6:31.
I have been following the Assange psy op closely and can offer the following.

This site, WashingtonBlog, and AmericanEveryman have been the three best of the 'dissident' bloggers IMO. Nobody also had it covered until he crawled into a bag of weed and hasn't been seen since ;)
He'll be back.

The only big site (my personal favorite) to do actual investigative journalism on Assange is globalresearch.ca
They have been all over this.

The dirty treasonous fake left sites who are 100% in with this psy op are IMO

Alternet
Huffpost
rawstory
AfterDowningStreet/War is a Crime
World Can't Wait
The Nation
NPR and that liar Goodman

The only difference between those sites and CNN or FoxNews is the color of the kool aid. Brutal.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous,

The following are good sources on Wikileaks: William Engdahl, Wayne Madsen and veteranstoday.com.

But don't simply trust them:

There's also plenty of public information on Wikileaks.

For example, look at their history, who funded them, who's on their board and their affiliations (eg. National Endowment for Democracy (i.e. CIA)). And, of course, what patent lies are they pushing. Assange is infamous for his statements on 911, for the media outlets he leaks to (NYT, Guardian, Spiegel), for the remarkable absence of any substantive leaks that are not in support of DoD objectives, for the inexplicable lack of leaks on Israel despite their flagrant and frequent crimes, and of course for the utter blatant theatre of the rape accusations.

It's quite possible Assange really is just a dupe, rather than a Macchiavellian operator. Such stupidity is not rare, particularly if there's money involved to cloud judgment. And there is. Lots.

Assange may or may not understand his masters. In particular, he may at some point be more valuable dead than alive.

Also...

And this is important.

... look into who owns the various media companies Assange is dealing with, including his new book publishers. Look into the initial funders.

Anyone with the least interest in the truth will see a clear pattern emerge.

In short, yes, the zionist billionaires really do form a discreet, interlocked power structure that exerts vast influence, especially on the worldview of the West. Like the pull of a dark star.

After just a little research, you should be familiar with the Sulzbergers, Grahams, Bronfmans, Murdochs, Redstones, Saatchis, etc. And also the Greenbergs, Crowns, Rothschilds, George Soros, Larry Fink, Marcus Agius, David Rubenstein, and others. Even ignoring the svengalis of the media, financial and weapons worlds, there have been many zionists with intellectual influence in the "cerebral cortices" of Western power: RAND, DARPA, Hudson Institute, the Committee on the Present Danger, Aspen Institute, Center for Strategic and International Studies. Yehezkel Dror is an excellent exponent.

There is a wider game happening here. The Wikileaks psyop is just a very small part of it.

Anon said...

Many thanks for all these detailed comments.

- Aangirfan

 
Site Meter