Tuesday, November 25, 2008

The Break Up of the USA into Six Parts

How it might look in the future?

On 24 November 2008, Professor Igor Panarin, in an interview with Izvestia, said that the USA is heading for collapse, and will break up. (Russian analyst predicts decline and breakup of U.S. )

Panarin, 60, is a professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and has written books on information warfare.

Professor Igor Panarin said:

A. "The dollar is not secured by anything.

"The country's foreign debt has grown like an avalanche, even though in the early 1980s there was no debt.

"By 1998, when I first made my prediction, it had exceeded $2 trillion.

"Now it is more than 11 trillion.

B. "This is a pyramid that can only collapse...

"It is already collapsing.

"Due to the financial crisis, three of the largest and oldest five banks on Wall Street have already ceased to exist, and two are barely surviving.

"Their losses are the biggest in history.

"Now what we will see is a change in the regulatory system on a global financial scale: America will no longer be the world's financial regulator."

When asked who would replace the U.S. in regulating world markets, he said:

"Two countries could assume this role: China, with its vast reserves, and Russia, which could play the role of a regulator in Eurasia."


C. Asked why he expected the U.S. to break up into separate parts, he said:

"A whole range of reasons.

"Firstly, the financial problems in the U.S. will get worse.

"Millions of citizens there have lost their savings.

"Prices and unemployment are on the rise.

"General Motors and Ford are on the verge of collapse, and this means that whole cities will be left without work.

"Governors are already insistently demanding money from the federal center.

"Dissatisfaction is growing, and at the moment it is only being held back by the elections and the hope that Obama can work miracles.

"But by spring, it will be clear that there are no miracles."

He also mentioned the "vulnerable political setup",

"lack of unified national laws",

and "divisions among the elite, which have become clear in these crisis conditions."

Map from: American Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

D. He predicted that the U.S. will break up into six parts

1. the Pacific coast, with its growing Chinese population;

2. the South, with its Hispanics;

3. Texas, where independence movements are on the rise;

4. the Atlantic coast, with its distinct and separate mentality;

5. five of the poorer central states with their large Native American populations;

6. and the northern states, where the influence from Canada is strong.

E. On the fate of the U.S. dollar, he said:

"In 2006 a secret agreement was reached between Canada, Mexico and the U.S. on a common Amero currency as a new monetary unit.

"This could signal preparations to replace the dollar.

"The one-hundred dollar bills that have flooded the world could be simply frozen. Under the pretext, let's say, that terrorists are forging them and they need to be checked."


~~~

9 comments:

kenny's sideshow said...

This speculation might not be as far-fetched as it seems now to most people. We are now in a wait and see mode if the US economy will collapse and if the federal government will default on its debts.

A breakup of the US may even be a part of the globalists game plan. Divide and conquer always seems to work.

But what if the globalists plans have gone so awry that that have lost control and we have to fend for ourselves and think more locally and regionally than nationally and globally.

We are in a place where our constitution is nearly void and so a re-structuring and return to the roots of liberty may be necessary and a long term solution. Smaller is always said to be better.

If the federal government disappeared could we really align with neighboring states to create a new regional alliance?
Could this be possible without corruption?
How would trade work with the other new 'nation states'? What kind of currency?

Defensive militias would form but I can't see armed conflict with the other areas, after all they would be fellow former citizens. False flag attacks might render that point moot.

Internal squabbles would persist, a least for a good while. Many would have their own ideas how the new format should work.

The collapse of the welfare state would definitely bring violence to the inner cities which would spill into the outlying areas for at least 50 miles from the major populations centers. Crime in the rural areas would also be a problem. Illegal immigrants would be scapegoats to many so a lot of them would head back to where they came from, if possible. Everyone would be armed.

For a long time survival would be the key issue. We would have to work together or die.

Too many questions. No good answers.

I would have no problem with the southern states coming together but I would prefer that Texas be in that mix with us.

Perhaps the only alternative to stopping the break up of the US would be the immediate arrest of those at the top of government, the Federal Reserve and corporate/financial criminals. Many, many arrests. Send a message not only to the US citizens but to the world.

But who is going to do this?

Only in a worse case scenario will even a few Americans stand up to do the right thing, whatever that may turn out to be.

no2socialism said...

This great land has gone thru other terrible ecomonic times. Just recently in the mid 80's and let's not forget the Carter dissaster of the 70's. We are Americans, when the going get's tough WE get going. 50 states UNITED!! Indivisible with liberty & justice for all.

Michael said...

I don't think so, the way the Russian broke it up seens to go more by ethnic lines. lol totally destroyed his credibility right there. no real explanation. We will be fine a house divided cannot stand.

Economic's PHD said...

This is a bunch of bull crap . 60 years ago the democratic party was a southern party not a northeastern-centric party. The domocratic party helped the civil rights movment and soutern democrats in the "heartland" (mostly conservatives) revolted and became republicans because at the time they were most definatly biggots. 60 yuears ago you conservative flip flopers would be saying that northern republicans were immoral fatcats more intrested in money than in helping the common man through governmental aid. This is not about democratic and republican this is about conservative and liberal. And dont suger coat it by saying that liberals dont know how to run an economy, I think people who build and run major cities know a thing or two more about macroeconomics than ranchers and farmers.
Face it If you look at history (beyond and before the civil war) Liberal movments always win, ... always. Im not talking socilisim or communisim. In russia communisim is conservative. If there was a republican out there who didnt apropriate religion to get elected. I would vote for him/her over the top of a conservative democrat, because I think conservatives are always going to be one step behind the times. + if you refuse to belive in the clear evidence of evolution and prefer unsupported misinformation, then how can you be trusted to make other rational decisions.

Economic's PHD said...

This is a bunch of bull crap . 60 years ago the democratic-party was a southern party not a northeastern-centric party. The democratic-party helped the civil rights movement and southern democrats in the "heartland" (mostly conservatives) revolted and became republicans because at the time they were most defiantly bigots. 60 years ago you conservative flip floppers would be saying that northern republicans were immoral fatcats more interested in money than in helping the common man through governmental aid. This is not about democratic and republican this is about conservative and liberal. And don’t sugar coat it by saying that liberals dont know how to run an economy, I think people who build and run major cities know a thing or two more about macroeconomics than ranchers and farmers.
Face it if you look at history (beyond and before the civil war) Liberal movements always win ... ALWAYS. I’m not talking socialism or communism. In Russia communism is conservative. If there was a republican out there who didn’t appropriate religion to get elected. I would vote for him/her over the top of a conservative democrat, because I think conservatives are always going to be one step behind the times. + if you refuse to believe in the clear evidence of evolution and prefer unsupported misinformation, then how can you be trusted to make other rational decisions.

IBM Lenovo Laptop Parts said...

I do not even know where to begin, at the Amero (which they keep denying), FEMA CAMPS, or with the giant problem of a global agenda, a.k.a. The New World Order. America's fate is in the hands of the people. Mass amounts are being manipulated and programed under Neuro-linguistic Programming and PWA (Perception Without Awareness) campaigns. Everyone feels something big coming and that they are being prepared for something soon to come. People need to stop saying "I Don't Care Anymore" and start taking the responsibility that all of us have as Americans. John Harris, Alex Jones, and even George Noory are starting to wake people up and consciousness needs to come soon or the future of America really is in trouble.

Natehc1984 said...

I think American will break up eventually, as different parts of this country have vary different ideas on how to govern themselves. But when it does happen, it wont happen like this professor says it will. LA will never be in a country with SF or Seattle, and Rockies will never be in the same country as Chicago, the Northern USA will not become a client state of Canada, and west coast is not under the influence of the Chinese.

Either way, I don't think the brake up of the United States will be a bad thing, but something that finally allows our governments to function, as the only governments that work are decentralized ones.

marry said...

Blogs are so informative where we get lots of information on any topic. Nice job keep it up!!
_____________________________

Architecture Dissertation

Anonymous said...

A Russian said what?

 
Site Meter