Tuesday, November 29, 2005

The use of the Muslim Brotherhood by MI6 and the CIA in Egypt, Syria and Iran

The Chicago Sun-Times reported, 28 November 2005:


Egypt, the world's most populous Arab country, is suddenly roiling with a wide-open, combative election that seems certain to end with the country's main Islamic group, the banned Muslim Brotherhood, as a big winner.

The country's rulers, longtime American allies, are starting to show signs of panic: Police have barred voters from polls and thugs have attacked Brotherhood supporters in recent days in an apparent effort to blunt the group's growing momentum.

Even before the final round of voting Thursday, Brotherhood loyalists have increased their seats in parliament fivefold. That's not enough to unseat the ruling party, but is still seen as a slap to President Hosni Mubarak.

The following is taken from http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/BritIslam.htm

Prior to World War II British Intelligence cultivated ties with the Brotherhood through agent Freya Stark, the British adventurer and writer (1). These covert connections were used to keep track of the growing German presence in North Africa and to stay informed of the many different political movements that were springing up. The Muslim Brotherhood spread throughout the Muslim world and has evolved into something like a Muslim equivalent of the West's Masonic brotherhood. It became one of the first Islamic Fundamentalist terror organizations...

"According to CIA agent Miles Copeland, the Americans began looking for a Muslim Billy Graham around 1955... When finding or creating a Muslim Billy Graham proved elusive, the CIA began to cooperate with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Muslim mass organization founded in Egypt but with followers throughout the Arab Middle East... This signalled the beginning of an alliance between the traditional regimes and mass Islamic movements against Nasser and other secular forces." (1)

The CIA was following the example of British Intelligence and sought to use Islam to further its goals. They wanted to find a charismatic religious leader that they could promote and control and they began to cooperate with groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood. With the rise of Nasser the Brotherhood was also courted more seriously by the pro-Western Arab regimes of Saudi Arabia and Jordan. They needed all the popular support that they could muster against the rise of Nasser-inspired Arab nationalism to keep their regimes intact.

The Muslim Brotherhood was an obvious ally against Nasser, because he had abolished it from Egypt after it was involved in a failed assassination attempt on his life in 1954. The Brotherhood rejected Nasser's policy that, for the most part, kept religion out of politics. Officially the Brotherhood was an outlawed organization, but it remained influential and active within Egypt working against the secular regime, often hand-in-hand with British Intelligence. In June of 1955 MI6 was already approaching the Brotherhood in Syria to agitate against the new government that showed strong left-wing tendencies and a desire to merge with Egypt (2). The Brotherhood became an even more important asset after Nasser announced the Egyptian takeover of the Suez...

In Syria, in 1982, there was a major conflict between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Syrian government at the city of Hamma that resulted in 20,000 casualties. In the aftermath Syria's President Asad revealed that the Muslim Brotherhood forces were armed with US-made equipment...

Israel, forever inclined to back divisive movements, surfaced as another supporter of Islam and began to fund the Muslim Brotherhood and the Palestinian Islamic movement Hamas." (8)
The most noteworthy success of the Islamic movement during this time was of course the overthrow of the Shah of Iran and the installation of the Ayatollah Khomeini as the Islamic dictator. British Intelligence had used their contacts with Iran's mullahs and ayatollahs to help overthrow Mossadegh and install the Shah back in 1953, and these contacts were maintained and used again to overthrow the Shah when his regime fell out of favor.

The Establishment history of Iran's Islamic Revolution is that Khomeini's revolt was spontaneous and populist, and that it overthrew a repressive dictatorship that was hated by the people but supported wholeheartedly by the United States. It is true that the Shah's government was not a democracy and that his secret service, trained by the CIA, was one of the most effective intelligence organizations in the world. But what is not reported is that prior to the British-sponsored massive public relations campaign on behalf of the Ayatollah the government of the Shah was loved by the vast majority of the population.

After taking over from Mossadegh the Shah began to push forward a number of nationalist policies that increased his popularity at home but, in some cases, worried the Anglo-American Establishment. First, he signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company. Then in 1963 he pushed forward on a series of popular reforms that became known as the White Revolution. The Shah evolved into a nationalist whose path paralleled that of Nasser far too much for the Establishment's liking:

- He bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown's own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers, allowing over one a half million people to become land owners and ending the old feudal system.

- He allowed women the right to vote, and brought an end to the wearing of the veil, which were "Westernizing" moves unwelcomed by the religious sector.

- He pushed forward on a $90 billion nuclear power program.

- He moved to shut down the lucrative opium industry that had been created during the days of British Empire control that had been running for a hundred years. (9)...

The attack on the Shah's government came through the Muslim Brotherhood and through the mullahs and ayatollahs of Iran, supported and manipulated by British Intelligence...

Dr. John Coleman, a former British Intelligence agent... states in his report on Iran's Islamic Revolution (11) that the Muslim Brotherhood was created by "the great names of British Middle East intelligence" ...and that their mission was to "keep the Middle East backward so that its natural resource, oil, could continue to be looted..."

Dr. Coleman writes that in 1980 the broadcasts of Radio Free Iran divided the enemies of the Shah into four categories: 1. Iranian politicians bought by the Israeli Shin Bet, 2. The CIA's network of agents, 3. The feudal landowners, 4. The Freemasons and the Muslim Brotherhood (viewed as the same enemy).

In his report Dr. Coleman writes that in Iran, "At one time there was even a joke about the mullahs being stamped 'made in Britain.'" When the Shah introduced his plan for modernization in 1963 the Ayatollah Khomeini emerged as the leader of the religious opposition. Up until his exile from Iran in 1964, Khomeini was based at the religious city of Qom. Dr. Coleman relates that Radio Free Iran claimed that while at Qom Khomeini received a "monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, the British."

Notes http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/BritIslam.htm

It would seem that the UK and US military like governments to be fundamentalist because then things are easier to control.



Anonymous said...

What is going on in the world? Cant we all just raise our families in peace?

Anonymous said...

you people don't realise this,all this is The freemason plan(the satanic group) to take over the world,they want us to fight each other so that they can introduce the so-called "New world order"believe it or not this is bigger than all of us because people who are in charge of our govermants are bribed,to them is money but they don't know whats coming.N.B!!people beware for the satanists(FreemasonS) seems to be succeding in manipulating all of us,DO NOT TAKE U.S AS YOUR PILLAR ALREADY THEIR GOVERMENT IS FREEMASONS,CHECK THEIR DOLLAR BILL IT IS MARKED WITH SATANIC SYMBOL,HAURUS EYE

Anonymous said...

I don't understand. If the CIA and British intelligence overthrew Mubarak, how does one explain Mubarak's long-term, good standing with the U.S.? The CIA consists of factions with differing agendas, some of which are contrary to U.S. interests in the Mid-East? I think not.

Anonymous said...

Its all just a pageant. Not real. The public thinks its real and it looks real. But under it all it is very fake and well planned and coordinated. Wars are fake. Revolutions are fake. Politics are fake. Even some of the environmental issues are faked....now when I say fake I mean planned and carried out. These things are not some random event. None of it. We are lied to about everything. I really don't think there is one single thing we have not been lied too about. Even most of the conspiracy theories are lies. Good luck with trying to figure it all out.

Anon said...

Mubarak opposed US-Israeli plans on the Sudan, Iran, Iraq and Palestine. He opposed US plans for a Greater Middle East. Israel saw Mubarak's Egypt as its main Arab enemy.

- Aangirfan

Muhammad Rafeeq said...

This article is absolute rubbish. Admittedly the Ikhwaan have some infiltrators and some at the top in more recent times. However they have NEVER collaborated with non-Muslim agencies and NEVER will. They are an Islamic dawah party and as such have only ever proslethysed Muslims. They have never been a political party, they are only interested in religious agendas.

Anonymous said...

This seems very plausible, but it could be disinformation to undermine the Iranian revolution. Intelligence networks are a house of mirrors. However, the take on things in this article is supported by historical facts and is very coherent. I'd bet it's true.

Anonymous said...

Why would CIA, Britain, Israel, Freemasons, or any such Establishment or society oppose some party that is Pro-West? And why would the Western Establishment Support an Islamic fundamentalist group or party? Can someone please explain in detail?

Site Meter