Saturday, July 23, 2005

London Bombs 7 7 - Part 2

.



This material has been updated.

Click on the following link for the updated version:

London Bombs





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Original version below:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




The name of Shahzad Tanweer has been linked to the London bombs of 7 July 2005.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/story/0,16132,1527429,00.html

"Ten days ago Shahzad Tanweer, a 22-year-old British Asian, was playing cricket in the local park with his friends. It was something he loved to do. He was a sporty young man who loved martial arts, drove his dad's Mercedes and had many friends in the Beeston area of Leeds.

"'He is sound as a pound,' said Azi Mohammed, a close friend. 'The idea that he was involved in terrorism or extremism is ridiculous. The idea that he went down to London and exploded a bomb is unbelievable.

"'I only played cricket in the park with him around 10 days ago. He is not interested in politics."'

~~~

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/110705warningtotheworld.htm

The following is from Prison Planet:

Members of Vladimir Putin's FSB were caught planting bombs in a Russian apartment building in 1999 by the Moscow police...

Kermit Roosevelt admited on NPR radio that in 1953 the CIA and British intelligence carried out a wave of bombings and shootings in Iran. He then went on to brag about how they subsequently blamed the bombings on Iran's President, Mossadegh...

The British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents within the Omagh bomb squad. Click here for an archive of this evidence.

In what was called 'the strategy of tension,' Operation Gladio, a CIA/MI6 controlled state terror program swept Europe over three decades.

In sworn testimomy, a Gladio agent, Vincenzo Vinciguerra, made the following comment:

"You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

And we ask the question, isn't it convenient for the kingpins of the war on terror that none of the terror attacks ever harm the establishment they are supposedly aimed at?

Pentagon document Field Manual FM 30-31B openly discusses launching terrorist attacks in nations that "do not react with sufficient effectiveness" to the geopolitical demands of the Globalists.

How many of the family members of the London subway bombing victims are aware of the fact that in a 2000 investigation the Italian Senate concluded that the 1980 Bologna train bombing that killed 85 people was carried out by "men inside Italian state institutions and ... men linked to the structures of United States intelligence."?

Gladio was continued by way of Central American death squads and that policy is being ressurected today in Iraq.

The right wing extremist groups are still controlled by the state to this day. A 2003 court case embarassed the German government when it was discovered that one in seven Neo Nazis was a secret service agent, and in many cases had been for decades. The Neo-Nazis are controlled by the government and used as a means to restrict any form of alternative political speech.

~~~

http://www.prisonplanet.com/archive_mi5terror.html

Archive

~~~

Http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2005/07/birth-of-london-bomb-official-story.html

From Xymphora-

Just a few early questions:

1. Why would suicide bombers need timers? Are we to believe that all four of them died when they mistakenly set off their bombs?

2. Why would suicide bombers carry identification which would lead the authorities directly to their colleagues? How did it survive in at least three of the bombs? I am reminded of the convenient passport found at the World Trade Center.

3. If all four video cameras on the bus were not working, how do the police know what happened on the bus? The witness who saw someone fiddling with a bag just begs the question of whether the fiddler was a bomber. Why do video cameras on buses need to be switched on by the drivers?

4. Why did Jack Straw state so quickly that it was al Qaeda? Is the theory that it is still al Qaeda, or some other group?

5. How did the British know to warn Netanyahu so quickly? If they knew enough to warn Netanyahu, why didn't they have enough time to shut down the subway system? Or did they?

6. Why was the transportation system still operating when the bus bomb went off, nearly an hour later than the subway bombs? One theory is that the last bomber got on the bus after the subway system was closed!

7. How easy would it be to pay some Muslim British men, who are told to carry identification, to drive to London and sit in specific places on specific subway trains or buses? When the bombs go off and the identification is found, you have instant patsies, and British Muslims in the frame. The fact they were seen together on video footage then becomes just part of the set-up. With so many known video cameras in London, why wouldn't they take care not to be seen together? They could have entered London separately if they did not want to be identified as part of a 'cell', and avoid giving the police information that could be used to trace their colleagues. As is often the case with these stories, we are asked to believe that they would be technically proficient ('military grade' explosives), but make the dumbest small mistakes.

8. What happened to the story, out of Canada and New Zealand, that the police shot one or two men near Canary Wharf?

The bombers are all dead, and dead men tell no tales. They were kind enough to leave enough identification, and enough video footage, to tie them to British Muslim colleagues.

~~~

Http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:-5hXvsEsDGUJ:www.kcs.cambs.sch.uk/depts/history/detailed/gp%2520plot.htm+gunpowder+plot+kcs&hl=en&start=2

"There is considerable evidence that there was no real Gunpowder Plot and that the idea of it was invented by Robert Cecil in order to discredit the Catholics, not to mention other motives such as removing a political rival (Northumberland) and gaining land from the the confiscated estates of Midland Catholics. This view of the plot provides answers to some otherwise awkward questions such as: Why were the Essex rebels let off a so lightly, and what exactly was meant by 'Reserved to her Majesty's use'? Why was Parliament postponed and how did the coal cellar became so easily and conveniently available? Where did so much gunpowder come from? Wasn't Tresham's warning letter an obvious giveaway? Why did Monteagle give it to Cecil and why didn't Cecil inform the King immediately? Why didn't Guy Fawkes escape after the first search and was he really tortured? How come the Midland rebels were so quickly surrounded by the Sheriff's men and why were Catesby and Percy both shot?"

~~~

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/071305Leonard/071305leonard.html

The following is from Online Journal:

'London Britches Falling Down'

By John Leonard - Online Journal Contributing Writer.

A British disaster recovery consultant working at the scene of the London 7/7 bombings tells British TV and radio how they occurred precisely at the times and places scheduled in a terrorism drill he was running.

Terrorism experts Jones and Tarpley explain why terror drills are a sure sign of a false flag op—they create the alibi that covers up the activities of insider perpetrators.

July 13, 2005—The slip was showing On Her Majesty's Secret Service, broadcast on prime time TV for all Britain to see on the evening of 7/7—but almost no one noticed.

It happened on a special called Target London. Rescue workers on one half of the screen, and on the other, Peter Power, a British consultant, innocently giving the game away.

Can you see what's wrong with this picture?

Power: Today we were running an exercise for a company . . . 1,000 people involved in the whole organization—with the crisis team. And the most peculiar thing was, it was we based on a scenario of simultaneous attacks on a underground and mainline station. So we had to suddenly switch an exercise from fictional to real. . . .

Interviewer: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario?

Power: Almost precisely.

Within the hour Mr. Power was on the radio, too:

Power: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

Host: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

Power: Precisely.

You might need to be a paranoid 9/11 conspiracy theorist like me to understand what Mr. Power was saying, since as a normal person, he himself was surprised but not suspicious.Well, this was exactly how the covert perps or moles in the US air defense agencies covered for whatever they had in the air on 9/11: with a drill for the very attack they were carrying out.

Here is how Joseph Paul Watson and Alex Jones explain it:

The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartmentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.

Thus the drill also helps keep the number of witting accomplices small. You don't need an entire agency made up of homicidal sociopaths.

Terrorism expert Webster G. Tarpley gives an example in his 9/11 Synthetic Terror:

Staff exercises or command exercises are perfect for a rogue network which is forced to conduct its operations using the same communications and computer systems used by other officers who are not necessarily party to the illegal operation, coup or provocation as it may be. A putschist officer may be working at a console next to another officer who is not in on the coup, and who might indeed oppose it if he knew about it. The putschist's behavior is suspicious: what the hell is he doing? The loyal officer looks over and asks the putschist about it. The putschist cites a staff maneuver for which he is preparing. The loyal officer concludes that the putschist's activities are part of an officially sanctioned drill, and his suspicions are allayed. The putschist may even explain that participation in the staff exercise requires a special security clearance which the loyal officer does not have. The conversation ends, and the putschist can go on with his treasonous work.

How could this have worked in London? Mr. Powers would be like the loyal agent without the supersecret clearance; his job in the drill was to unwittingly help provide camouflage. Several participants could be given the "play-acting" role of terrorists who plant bags with "fake" bombs in them at the appropriate point in the scenario—but this time, real bombs were substituted. Whether witting or not, they would run no risk of arrest—it was "just a drill." The WTC bombing of 1993 was perpetrated by the FBI in just this way: the patsies were told it was a sting operation to catch the terrorists, but at the last minute, live explosives were "somehow" used instead.

Hopefully, there are enough people out there who can add two and two together from Mr. Power's candor. The drill and the confidential identity of the "client company" may have covered over the trail, so this might be the best smoking gun we get on 7/7.

Although it does seem this penchant for false flag ops is going to trip them up sooner or later. It's gotten to be such an awfully regular habit, do they even know how to stop?

Transcript:

POWER: Today we were running an exercise for a company—bear in mind now that I'm in the private sector—and we sat everybody down in the city—1000 people involved in the whole organization—with the crisis team. And the most peculiar thing was it was we based on a scenario of simultaneous attacks on a underground and mainline station. So we had to suddenly switch an exercise from fictional to real. And one of the first things is, get that bureau number, when you have a list of people missing, tell them. And it took a long time—

INTERVIEWER: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario?

POWER: Almost precisely. I was up to 2 oclock this morning, because it's our job, my own company. Visor Consultants, we specialize in helping people to get their crisis management response, how you jump from slow time thinking to quick time doing. And we chose a scenario with no assistance, which is based on a terrorist attack because they've been close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen there in the city, and there are more American banks in this city than there are in the whole of New York—a logical thing to do.

~~~

http://www.libertyforum.org/

From Liberty Forum:

A security company, Fortress GB, a smart card technology developer and integrator for ICTS Europe:

ICTS Europe is an Israeli security company based in the Netherlands, a subsidiary of which is Huntleigh. Huntleigh was the security contractor at Logan Airport on 9/11 that failed to provide us with CCTV evidence of hijackers. The London Underground is one of Fortress GB’s clients and according to their press release they provide smart card technology (personal details and biometric information) for contractors that operate in Tube stations. It makes me wonder if Peter Power’s Visor Consultants were identified by these smart cards and if the four young men from Leeds were ever issued smart cards.

~~~

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=11173369&blogID=34968730&Mytoken=20050708024711

"It's proven that in the 1993 WTC bombing, the FBI planted Emad A. Salem to infiltrate an Arab group in New York. His job was to act as an agent provocateur, inciting violent attacks. It was Salem who convinced the other participants to bomb the World Trade Center. When he was asked to assemble the bomb, he went to the FBI to ask for harmless powder to avoid a catastrophe. The FBI essentially cut him off. To make a long, complicated story short and simple: The FBI spent $3 million of your tax money to blow up the World Trade Center."

~~~~

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/150705busbombing.htm

The following is from Prison Planet:

By Paul Joseph Watson of Prison Planet, July 15 2005:

We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company responsible for the majority of London buses.

Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site of the bus bombing last Thursday.The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground, every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this bus was diverted.

The driver notes the following about CCTV maintainence.

"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. this is done by a private contractor....So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's rubbish, I work for the company I know different."

Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came to inspect the CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the person spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV is working? Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry out work, this time it was different.

Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the company."

I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV is regularly maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.

This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras were not working.

Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV a means of disabling the CCTV, or something even darker? Were the contractors, who were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?

~~~

The Gunpowder Plot of 1605:

The official story of the gunpowder plot does not make sense.

The 'confessions' were obtained under torture.

Why would the Catholic plotters have wanted to blow up parliament when it housed not only Protestants but also all the country's leading Catholics?

Elizabeth, James' protestant daughter, was was due to take over, if the plotters succeeded.

Why would the Catholic plotters want Elizabeth on the throne?

The government had a monopoly on gunpowder and it was stored in places like the Tower of London.

How did the conspirators get hold of 36 barrels of gunpowder without drawing attention to themselves?

How was the gunpowder moved across London from the Tower of London to Westminster (at least two miles distant) without anyone seeing it? The River Thames would not have been used as it could have lead to the gunpowder becoming damp and useless. Thirty six barrels would have been a sizeable quantity to move without causing suspicion.

Why were men who were known to be Catholics allowed to rent out a house so near to the Houses of Parliament?How did they move 36 barrels from that house to the cellar of the Houses of Parliament without anyone noticing?

Why, for the first time in history, was there a search of Parliament's cellars that conveniently found Guy Fawkes.

Why was the soldier who killed the plotters Catesby and Percy at Holbeech House in the Midlands, given such a large pension for life (10p a day for life) when their arrest and torture was more desirable so that the names of any other conspirators might be found out?

~~~

http://www.lemonde.fr/web/article/0,1-0@2-3226,36-671207@51-671291,0.html

Rainbow Warrior the Greenpeace flagship was sunk by the French secret service in Auckland harbour, New Zealand, on July 10, 1985. One man died. The French president Fran├žois Mitterrand himself had given authorisation for the bombing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/france/story/0,11882,1367287,00.html

December 6, 2004French bomb squad officers slipped 150 grams of plastic explosive into the side pocket of a blue bag waiting to be loaded on to a plane. Baggage handlers put the suitcase on a conveyor belt, where it was swiftly dispatched on to a waiting plane. The two officers responsible are to face an internal investigation.

~~~

Osama and the CIA writing the scripts?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2088-1697230,00.html

Simon Jenkins, in the 17 July 2005 Sunday Times, refers to the London bombers.

The one thing the bomber craves is fame. So why offer it on a plate? Why does BBC news ghoulishly retrace the Thameslink “trail of terror”, or Newsnight explain exactly how to make a Tube bomb, or a radio reporter declare that “race relations in Leeds will never be the same again”? Who is writing these scripts — Osama Bin Laden?...

For the past week I have sometimes wondered whether Bin Laden himself were not controlling the British media.

~~~

The explosives and the devices:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/?feed=TopNews&article=UPI-1-20050713-07514000-bc-britain-explosions.xml

Traces of the explosive known as C4 were found at all four blast sites, and The Times of London said Scotland Yard considers it vital to determine if they were part of a terrorist stockpile.

C4 is manufactured mostly in the United States, and is more deadly and efficient than commercial varieties. It is easy to hide, stable, and is often missed by traditional bomb-sniffing detection systems, the newspaper said.

Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.

United Press International.

~~~

http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/07/giuliani-linked-to-london-terror-drill.html

9/11 researcher, Nico Haupt has uncovered a connection between Rudi Giuliani and Peter Power -the former member of the UK anti-terrorism force, who said on TV that he was running a coincident terror drill centered on the Underground stations which were bombed.

It seems that Power served on the Advisory Board to the Canadian Centre for Emergency Preparedness(CCEP), along with none other than Richard Sheirer, Senior Vice President, Giuliani & Partners.

As well as being director of New York's overall emergency response planning in the lead-in to 9/11, Sheirer himself was the city's on-scene coordinator of multiple agency responses to the 9/11 attacks themselves.

~~~

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3352

Rixon Stewart, in the Truth Seeker, 16 July 2005, wrote about the London bombs.

According to Stewart, the media claimed the four bombers met at Luton Station before dispersing to their designated targets.

The Sunday Times reported that Mohammed Sidique Khan, a 30-year-old teaching assistant, came under scrutiny in 2004 but was judged not to be a threat by MI5.

According to the 'Truth Seeker', commuters who passed through Luton on the day of the actual bombings claimed that trains through the station were being cancelled or sent back from whence they came, at around the time the bombers are reported to have passed through, an hour before the actual bomb blasts.

Commuters who travelled through one of the underground stations attacked, Kings Cross, emailed the 'Truth Seeker' describing scenes of chaos and confusion before the actual bombings, the result London Transport staff explained, of problems with power surges and signal malfunctions.

Stewart writes:

Right now we cannot say with any certainty where the events of July 7th are heading but something is definitely in the offing.

Residents near Wright Patterson Air Force Base in the US report tremendous activity there, far more so than usual. Coupled with this we are informed that all leave has been cancelled at some US military bases and with the construction of a huge US military base in Israel, scheduled to be operational by September, something big is looming in the months ahead.

So if something is looming, you might ask, where will it happen? Just as the events of 9/11 led to Afghanistan and Iraq, we would suggest that the horrors of 7/7/05 are intended to lead to another war somewhere in the Middle East.

American Base in Israel

www.thegoldenreport.com/asp/jerrysnewsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=928&print=yes

~~~

http://vialls.homestead.com/yvonnefletcher.html

On the 17th April 1984, policewoman Yvonne Fletcher was shot outside the Libyan Embassy in London. Libya was held responsible for Yvonne Fletcher's death.

Examination of the scientific evidence showed that the shot which killed Yvonne Fletcher could not have been fired from the Libyan Embassy, but only from Enserch House a few doors away. This building had links to the CIA.

London Bombs 7 7

London Bombs 7 7 - Part 3 - updates

London Bombs 77 - Part 4 - updates

London Bombs 77 - Part 5 - updates

~~~

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/london_exercise_video.html

http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/07/pictures-from-demolition.html

http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2005/07/london-oddities.html

7/7 inside job?

7/7 Inside job? Part 2.

False Flag; CCTV cameras 7 7 2005 ; London 1994

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/090705bombingexercises.htm

http://www.simplyappalling.blogspot.com/#112083238456427558

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

http://www.vialls.com/zionist/yvonnefletcher.html

http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/0889_what_behind_london_attacks.html
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/jul2005/lond-j13.shtml

~~~

No comments:

 
Site Meter